Interspeech 2019 2019
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2019-2638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privacy-Preserving Speaker Recognition with Cohort Score Normalisation

Abstract: In many voice biometrics applications there is a requirement to preserve privacy, not least because of the recently enforced General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Though progress in bringing privacy preservation to voice biometrics is lagging behind developments in other biometrics communities, recent years have seen rapid progress, with secure computation mechanisms such as homomorphic encryption being applied successfully to speaker recognition. Even so, the computational overhead incurred by processing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nautsch et al. [24] addressed the issue of computational overhead. They present a solution for computationally manageable privacy‐preserving speaker recognition with cohort score normalisation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nautsch et al. [24] addressed the issue of computational overhead. They present a solution for computationally manageable privacy‐preserving speaker recognition with cohort score normalisation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have attempted to tackle privacy protection in speech processing systems by extracting privacy-preserving features from speeches [6], [7], extracting features from encrypted signals [8], augmenting models with adversarial representations [9], and applying score normalizations [10]. However, such feature-or model-level privacy protection techniques have a critical drawback, wherein the users cannot verify that their personal information is actually removed from the resultant features or models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%