Privacy-Preserving Sports Wearable Data Fusion Framework

Abstract

When the sports industry has access to advanced training and preparation techniques, the sports sector is entering a new era, where real-time data processing services have a crucial priority in improving physical fitness and avoiding injuries to athletes. The primary sports support methodology is based on multiple sensors, mainly wearables, often of different types and technology, which collect somatometric data in real time and are usually analyzed with deep learning technologies. And while modern athletes train and prepare intelligently using the innovative techniques of available technology, there is considerable concern about the use of personal data. There is great concern about cyberattacks and possible data leaks that could affect the sports industry and sports in general. To secure the personal data of athletes collected and analyzed by sports wearables, this paper presents a privacy-preserving sports wearable data fusion framework. This is an advanced methodology based on Lagrange's relaxation method for the problem of multiple assignments and synthesis of information by numerous sensors and the use of differential privacy to access databases with personal information, ensuring that this information will remain personal without a third entity may disclose the identity of the athlete who provided the data.

Retracted: Privacy‐Preserving Sports Wearable Data Fusion Framework

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”