2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private conservation funding from wildlife tourism enterprises in sub-Saharan Africa: Conservation marketing beliefs and practices

Abstract: Conservation finance in many African nations relies heavily on tourism. Some commercial tourism companies run conservation projects, funding: private, communal and public reserves; anti-poaching, breeding, and translocation programs; and local employment to gain political support. All this relies on successful marketing, to attract tourists. We therefore analyse how these enterprises market their conservation projects. We find that they market: wildlife viewing opportunities first; luxury and exclusiveness sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the ecotourism revenue generated from entry fees has been dramatically declining. Despite an entry fee is the indispensable source of conservation funding ( Buckley, 2003 ; Buckley and Mossaz, 2018 ), the revenue collected from the entry fees were neither adequate nor feasible to reduce the rate of biodiversity losses in BMNP and other PAs in Ethiopia.
Figure 2 Annual visitors' number from 1988 to 2017 (Source: Aseres and Sira, 2020 ).
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the ecotourism revenue generated from entry fees has been dramatically declining. Despite an entry fee is the indispensable source of conservation funding ( Buckley, 2003 ; Buckley and Mossaz, 2018 ), the revenue collected from the entry fees were neither adequate nor feasible to reduce the rate of biodiversity losses in BMNP and other PAs in Ethiopia.
Figure 2 Annual visitors' number from 1988 to 2017 (Source: Aseres and Sira, 2020 ).
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars (e.g. Togridou et al, 2006;Baral et al, 2008;Buckley and Mossaz, 2018) suggest options for generating additional funding sources such as conservation trust fund, donations, privatizations, and levying users' taxes. Because implementation of a new pricing policy may affect the visitation trend and consequently result in the decline of tourism income (Buckley, 2003;Casey and Schuhmann, 2019), the application of alternative pricing policy should rely on the analysis of acceptability, i.e., preferences and WTP (Thur, 2010;Murphy et al, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Valuation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the local population being an active agent, resource manager, who is able to make decisions and who controls activities that affect their own life is defended by Spinola (2006), although he considers this participatory planning model to be more difficult to be implemented and should always be analyzed in the long term to enable the creation of the business mass and the creation / application of environmental legislation. Buckley and Mossaz (2018) confirm the importance of tourism companies to finance the creation of private reserves, community conservation and protection of public areas, increase of local employment as well as the combination of two types of marketing: the main marketing that promotes proximity with the wild nature excelling in luxury and comfort and the conservation marketing that promotes the sale of articles to finance the conservation. Tourists are looking for new experiences and exciting challenges, and tourist destinations operators need to be able to allow a unique experience tailored to the interests of this type of tourists.…”
Section: Communicating Ecotourismmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For example, information can be provided on-site at the destination while encountering wildlife, but also early-on in the experience by agents selling wildlife-based tourism packages (e.g. Buckley & Mossaz, 2018;Lamb, 2019). Post-visit resources have also been recommended to allow tourists to follow-up on particular interests and conservation strategies, extending the conservation potential beyond the tourist experience (Ardoin et al, 2015;Hughes, 2011Hughes, , 2013Rattan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Link Experiences With Consumption Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%