Private Matters and Public Knowledge in Rural Communities: The Paradox

Haddon, Arlene; Merritt‐Gray, Marilyn; Wuest, Judith; Cameron, Catherine Ann; Nason‐Clark, Nancy; Stirling, Mary Lou; Miedema, Baukje

doi:10.3138/9781442682870-021

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secrecy among family members can potentially increase emotional intensity and chronic anxiety in the family unit (Knauth ), yet secrecy about past abuse can also be a protective measure against public visibility or potential stigma (Haddon et al . ). This may be accomplished by developing a ‘public’ storyline for sharing with others (Wuest et al .…”

Section: Background: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 97%

Predicting family health and well‐being after separation from an abusive partner: role of coercive control, mother's depression and social support

Broughton

Ford‐Gilboe

2017

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Background: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 97%

Predicting family health and well‐being after separation from an abusive partner: role of coercive control, mother's depression and social support

Broughton

Ford‐Gilboe

2017

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This led to a feminist participatory action study examining the meanings and responses to woman abuse in a rural context (Haddon, Merritt-Gray, Wuest, & HEAR Research Team, 2004). This was a lengthy, difficult, and rewarding process that brought together the perspectives and agency of diverse players and led to change as part of the research process, not just as a result of the findings (Wuest & Merritt-Gray, 1997).…”

Section: Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…One consequence of our feminist grounded theory study focusing on women leaving abusive partners (Merritt-Gray & Wuest, 1995;Wuest & Merritt-Gray, 1999, 2001b was that members of a community family violence committee who had helped us with our research called on us to help determine why their efforts to reduce woman abuse appeared to be ineffective. This led to a feminist participatory action study examining the meanings and responses to woman abuse in a rural context (Haddon, Merritt-Gray, Wuest, & HEAR Research Team, 2004). This was a lengthy, difficult, and rewarding process that brought together the perspectives and agency of diverse players and led to change as part of the research process, not just as a result of the findings (Wuest & Merritt-Gray, 1997).…”

Section: Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are We There Yet? Positioning Qualitative Research Differently

Wuest

2011

Qual Health Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Almost two decades ago, Janice Morse launched this conference, and QHR as a venue for qualitative health research scholarship. The health research climate was then resistant to qualitative research methods. Qualitative scholars portrayed the rigor of their work in traditional scientific language and justified qualitative approaches in opposition to quantitative approaches. Emphasis on difference expanded as we embraced paradigm debates and argued about location of particular research approaches. Increasingly, I have been challenged to reconsider the boundaries between and among research methods and paradigms as I struggled to answer my most pressing emerging questions. The focus of this presentation is consideration of how the position of qualitative research has shifted over the past 20 years. Based on my program of women's health research, I will discuss the appeal and pitfalls of concrete distinctions, the challenges of flexibility and convergence, and the necessity of moving beyond difference toward a complete research toolbox that is useful for improving health.

show abstract

Rita Nakashima Brock, Rebecca Ann Parker, and Governmental Atonement Theology

Blosser¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The writings of Rita Nakashima Brock and Rebecca Parker have perspicaciously highlighted challenges that atonement theology faces in its interface with the experiences of abused women and children. These thinkers have alerted the theological community to the fact that an atonement model which commends or valorizes the divinely-mandated suffering of an innocent victim (Jesus) can nefariously encourage domestic abuse victims to accept their own abuse, as if it were God’s will. Brock and Parker therefore recommend abandoning language which attaches any salvific significance to the Cross in atonement. This thesis explores and recommends an alternative form of theological language—called “governmental atonement theology”—which may ameliorate the problems noted by Brock and Parker. This study briefly examines the history and evolution of the governmental view from its early moorings in the theology of Hugo Grotius, up to its contemporary adaptation by René Girard. The focus then shifts to selected biblical expressions of the governmental view. Finally, this thesis demonstrates ways in which the governmental view can present the Cross as a saving event for abuse victims, while not implicating God in abuse.

show abstract

Private Matters and Public Knowledge in Rural Communities: The Paradox

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Predicting family health and well‐being after separation from an abusive partner: role of coercive control, mother's depression and social support

Predicting family health and well‐being after separation from an abusive partner: role of coercive control, mother's depression and social support

Are We There Yet? Positioning Qualitative Research Differently

Rita Nakashima Brock, Rebecca Ann Parker, and Governmental Atonement Theology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About