2020
DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2020.1758082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private military and security companies, corporate structure, and levels of violence in Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related empirical research that explores the PMSC-civilian casualties link shows that company culture, ownership, and the role of program managers serving as points of contact between PMSCs and clients help explain variation in civilian violence. Studying Iraqi governorates, Tkach (2020a) demonstrates that PMSCs with closed ownership exacerbate information asymmetries, thereby reducing the client's ability to select companies based on information about performance. This creates an advantage for companies that increase violence yet do not suffer reputational costs from lower levels of transparency, resulting in more civilian violence.…”
Section: Ethical Behavior: Existing Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Related empirical research that explores the PMSC-civilian casualties link shows that company culture, ownership, and the role of program managers serving as points of contact between PMSCs and clients help explain variation in civilian violence. Studying Iraqi governorates, Tkach (2020a) demonstrates that PMSCs with closed ownership exacerbate information asymmetries, thereby reducing the client's ability to select companies based on information about performance. This creates an advantage for companies that increase violence yet do not suffer reputational costs from lower levels of transparency, resulting in more civilian violence.…”
Section: Ethical Behavior: Existing Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the impact of the CEO's background should have a varying effect on the company's connection to the frequency of human rights abuses depending on the opportunity structure that limits or empowers what the CEOs can do. Of importance is the company's corporate status and the extent to which it subcontracts services as past research shows that both explain differences in PMSCs' contract fulfillment and human rights abuses (Akcinaroglu and Radziszewski, 2020;Tkach, 2020a). Private companies are accountable to a lower number of shareholders and are less scrutinized by the media for their connection to scandals (Eden, 2010), which could make it easier to recover from contract mismanagement and human rights violations.…”
Section: Ceos' Military Background and Pmscs' Human Rights Abusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation