2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.493383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private or Public Debt? The Drivers of Debt Priority Structure for UK Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our findings for earnings volatility are inconsistent with the liquidation efficiency hypothesis where risk should be negatively correlated with public debt given the difficulty in renegotiating across dispersed public bondholders. This is consistent with Barnes and Cahill () who find that UK firms with higher earnings volatility are more likely to borrow in public debt markets. We find no relationship between leverage and public debt use, which is inconsistent with Johnson ().…”
Section: Analysis Of Existing Debt MIXsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, our findings for earnings volatility are inconsistent with the liquidation efficiency hypothesis where risk should be negatively correlated with public debt given the difficulty in renegotiating across dispersed public bondholders. This is consistent with Barnes and Cahill () who find that UK firms with higher earnings volatility are more likely to borrow in public debt markets. We find no relationship between leverage and public debt use, which is inconsistent with Johnson ().…”
Section: Analysis Of Existing Debt MIXsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 See Houston and James (1996) and Hadlock and James (2002) for US evidence on the choice between public and private securities and Barnes and Cahill (2005) and Antoniou et al (2008) for UK firms. A small number of studies have examined the choice of public bond financing relative to syndicated bank loans (Altunbas et al, 2009) and syndicated loans relative to bilateral loans (Dennis and Mullineaux, 2000;Marsh, 2006;Sufi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our findings for earnings volatility are inconsistent with the liquidation efficiency hypothesis where risk should be negatively correlated with public debt given the difficulty in renegotiating across dispersed public bondholders. This finding is consistent with Barnes and Cahill (2005) for their UK sample. We find no relation between leverage and public debt use, which is inconsistent with Johnson (1997).…”
Section: (Ii) Determinants Of Existing Debt Sourcing MIXsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2 See Houston and James (1996) and Hadlock and James (2002) for US evidence on the choice between public and private securities and Barnes and Cahill (2005) and Antoniou et al (2008) for UK firms. A small number of studies have examined the choice of public bond financing relative to syndicated bank loans (Altunbas et al, 2009) and syndicated loans relative to bilateral loans (Dennis and Mullineaux, 2000;Marsh, 2006;Sufi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%