2021
DOI: 10.1002/alr.22922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private payer‐negotiated prices for FDA‐approved biologic treatments for allergic diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 Among hospitals disclosing prices within chargemasters, we found wide variation in payer-specific prices both across and within hospitals. These findings are consistent with recent work examining other service lines, including oncology, 14 allergy/immunology, 15 adult otolaryngology, 16 and radiology. 17 Price variation between hospitals may reflect differences in the cost of care delivery due to factors such as patient complexity or differences in operative technique, such as the application of topical anesthesia into the tonsillar fossae or use of the coblation device across hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 Among hospitals disclosing prices within chargemasters, we found wide variation in payer-specific prices both across and within hospitals. These findings are consistent with recent work examining other service lines, including oncology, 14 allergy/immunology, 15 adult otolaryngology, 16 and radiology. 17 Price variation between hospitals may reflect differences in the cost of care delivery due to factors such as patient complexity or differences in operative technique, such as the application of topical anesthesia into the tonsillar fossae or use of the coblation device across hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recent work suggests that nearly half of US hospitals are non‐compliant with the Hospital Price Transparency final rule 13 . Among compliant hospitals, analysis of service lines such as oncology, 14 allergy/immunology, 15 adult otolaryngology, 16 and radiology 17 has demonstrated wide variation in prices both across and within hospitals (i.e., by insurance payer). To our knowledge, no prior study has comprehensively examined price transparency for services at pediatric hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used descriptive statistics to characterize cancer therapies, disclosure of payer-specific cancer therapy pricing by cancer centers, and variation in disclosed cancer therapy prices. Using previously described methods, [20][21][22][23] we compared payer-specific prices between hospitals by performing a 4-step calculation to determine the across-center ratio for each drug. First, we determined the median price for each drug at each center that disclosed prices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using previously described methods, [20][21][22][23] we systematically reviewed each cancer center's website to determine whether the center publicly disclosed private payer-specific prices for items and services within a machine-readable file. 13 For each center with a price transparency file, we then extracted available private payer-specific prices for each cancer therapy in the study cohort; we limited data to prices from plans administered by private payers and excluded prices listed for public payers (eg, Medicare) and international insurance plans.…”
Section: Cancer Therapy Price Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One year after the Hospital Price Transparency rule was put into effect, only half of the hospitals in our sample disclosed prices for HNSCC therapies. Nondisclosure has been documented in previous studies and is concerning in that it limits a patient's ability to budget for out‐of‐pocket costs of care 17‐19 . A recent analysis by Xiao et al of the top 25 parenterally administered cancer therapies found a price disclosure rate of 44.1%, significant price variation between hospitals, and a large range in price markups over acquisition costs (118%‐633%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%