2018
DOI: 10.1553/eco.mont-10-1s87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private Protected Areas in Latin America: Between conservation, sustainability goals and economic interests. A review

Abstract: Worldwide, but particularly in Latin America, private protected areas (PPAs), including in mountain areas, have become increasingly numerous. In some Latin American countries, PPAs complement the public protected areas to a significant degree. Beneficiaries of these private protection initiatives, which often close gaps in fragmented biomes, may be governments or eco-tourism operators. Drawbacks of PPAs are the lack of clear definitions and ownership, the absence of suitable management, green grabbing, and lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Governments can help facilitate this process. In Mexico, for example, formal recognition of a PPA requires the existence of a management plan demonstrating the area's biological significance in the context of the National System of Protected Areas and the participation of all stakeholders (Hora et al, 2018). In the USA, government agencies provide strategic mapping to organisations setting up and managing PPAs, many of which adopt priorities in alignment with government-identified strategies (see Box The world is undergoing rapid change, the results of which are not fully understood.…”
Section: Box 12 Supporting Conservation and Economic Development In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments can help facilitate this process. In Mexico, for example, formal recognition of a PPA requires the existence of a management plan demonstrating the area's biological significance in the context of the National System of Protected Areas and the participation of all stakeholders (Hora et al, 2018). In the USA, government agencies provide strategic mapping to organisations setting up and managing PPAs, many of which adopt priorities in alignment with government-identified strategies (see Box The world is undergoing rapid change, the results of which are not fully understood.…”
Section: Box 12 Supporting Conservation and Economic Development In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the IUCN, private governance comprises protected areas under individual, cooperative, NGO or corporate control and/or ownership, and managed under not-for-profit or for-profit schemes (Dudley 2008). Although the establishment of PPAs is considered a good conservation measure by which to complement the conservation efforts made by the public administrations (Roldán et al 2010;Hora et al 2018), PPAs are often unrecognised by governments, and most of them are not included in the World Database on Protected Areas (Dudley 2008). Moreover, the scientific literature and research efforts have been more frequently focused on larger public protected areas (Capano et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the only state with 2.2% of its territory under private protection, making it one of the nations with the highest proportion of private conservation areas. Only small countries such as Costa Rica and Belize have a bigger relative share of their territory under private conservation [12]. 19.2% of Chile's territory is protected in the National Park System known as SNASPE (Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only small countries such as Costa Rica and Belize have a bigger relative share of their territory under private conservation [12]. 19.2% of Chile's territory is protected in the National Park System known as SNASPE (Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Estado) [12]. Furthermore, Chile has 308 Private Protected Areas, with an estimated area of 1,651,916 ha [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%