Private‐Sector Partner Selection for Public‐Private Partnership Projects Based on Improved CRITIC‐EMW Weight and GRA ‐VIKOR Method

Weng, Xiangjian; Yang, Shan

doi:10.1155/2022/9374449

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Through the CRITIC method, based on the values of network node indicators and network subsystem indicators, the weight of each node indicator (ω CRITIC j ), and the weight of each subsystem indicator (ω CRITIC l ). The calculation steps and formulas of the CRITIC method refer to the existing research [34], and are not repeated in the study.…”

Section: Critic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suitability of Site Selection for Mountain Railway Engineering Spoil Disposal Areas from a Multi-Scenario Perspective

Li,

Zeng,

Han

et al. 2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current approach to selecting sites for abandoned spoil areas primarily relies on qualitative methods, often overlooking the impact of policy factors on decision-making. Traditional single-site selection strategies may not be flexible enough to accommodate evolving external policy demands. Addressing this challenge is crucial for ensuring the site selection for abandoned spoil areas is both scientifically sound and policy-compliant. This research integrates various analytical methods, including principal component analysis, complex network theory, the CRITIC method, and the ordered weighted averaging method, to thoroughly evaluate the factors influencing site selection. Utilizing geographic information system (GIS) technology, the study simulates different policy scenarios, such as construction cost, social and ecological concerns, natural security, spatial accessibility, and a comprehensive balance approach. It specifically analyzes the suitability of the spoil site of a segment of the Chongqing ZW Railway under these policy conditions. Based on the actual policy situation in the local area, six potential suitable sites were screened with the help of field investigation. This study can offer a methodological framework and theoretical guidance for optimally locating mountain railway engineering waste disposal sites. In addition, the methodology presented in this study can be adapted to the development and change in policy scenarios.

show abstract

Section: Critic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suitability of Site Selection for Mountain Railway Engineering Spoil Disposal Areas from a Multi-Scenario Perspective

Li,

Zeng,

Han

et al. 2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finance ability [9,36,60] R 1 Performance quality [12,36,61] R 2 Infrastructure equipment [9,21,28] R 3 On-time delivery [12,21,60,62] R 4 Community acceptance [8,[40][41][42] S 1 Well-organizing and community [8,11,19] S 2 Resource availability [3,32,34] S 3…”

Section: Factors Abbreviationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The VIKOR method with the grey relational analysis is combined in a paper. Although this approach makes the results of the selection assessment more reasonable, it is a relatively complicated method for decision-makers to operate [19]. A work proposed a combined model based on BWM for evaluating and ranking the selection criteria and VIKOR for the final selection of partners [21].…”

Section: Comparative Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Grey rational analysis-VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (GRA-VIKOR) is proposed in a paper that considers the combined weights of the improved CRITIC-entropy weight method (EWM). In conjunction with the GRA, the VIKOR approach considers the inherent correlation between evaluation indicators, thus improving the validity of selection assessment results [19]. A two-phase framework is used in another paper to select partners.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simplifying the Complexity in the Problem of Choosing the Best Private-Sector Partner

Qiu

Sorourkhah

Kausar

et al. 2023

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments frequently partner with the private sector to provide infrastructure and public services. These cooperations, known as public–private partnerships (PPPs), have often failed. Sometimes, due to the problem’s complexity, the public sector cannot choose the right partner for these projects, which is one of the main reasons for failures. Complexity in such problems is associated with a large number of indicators, imprecise judgments of decision-makers or problem owners, and the unpredictability of the environment (under conditions of uncertainty). Therefore, presenting a simplified algorithm for this complicated process is the primary goal of the current research so that it can consider the problem’s various dimensions. While many researchers address the critical risk factors (CRFs) and others focus on key performance indicators (KPIs), this research has considered both CRFs and KPIs to choose the best private-sector partner. In addition, we used single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs) to collect decision-makers’ views, which can handle ambiguous, incomplete, or imprecise information. Next, by defining the ideal alternative and using the similarity measure, we specified the ranks of the alternative. Additionally, to face the uncertain environment, we examined the performance of options in four future scenarios. The steps of the proposed algorithm are explained in the form of a numerical example. The results of this research showed that by employing a simple algorithm, even people who do not have significant operations research knowledge could choose the best option by paying attention to the dimensions of the problem complexity.

show abstract

“…Additionally, the SBMS was eventually accomplished by the Improved Basic Uncertain Linguistic Information (IBULI)-based TOPSIS method. Weng et al [32] used the improved EW-CRITIC empowerment and GRA-VIKOR method to select private sector partners for public-private partnership projects and compared the evaluation results with those of traditional GRA, VIKOR, and TOPSIS methods to demonstrate the superiority of this method. Rostamzadeh et al [33] used the mixed CRITIC-TOPSIS method in the sustainable supply chain risk assessment to effectively manage the enterprise.…”

Section: Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Air Combat Control Ability Based on Eye Movement Indicators and Combination Weighting GRA-TOPSIS

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At present, expert scoring is mainly used to evaluate the air combat control ability, which is not accurate enough to effectively achieve the desired effect. In order to evaluate air battle managers’ air combat control ability more scientifically and accurately, using eye-tracking technology, a quantitative evaluation model is established based on eye movement indicators. Specifically, the air combat control ability was comprehensively assessed using the GRA-TOPSIS method based on the EW-CRITIC combination weighting. The model innovatively uses eye movement indicators as a vital evaluation basis. Firstly, it puts forth a comprehensive evaluation method by combining GRA with TOPSIS methods, using the EW and CRITIC methods for combined weighting, and giving full play to the advantages of various evaluation methods. Secondly, it not only effectively copes with the problem that the traditional evaluation method is deeply affected by subjectivity but also creatively provides a reasonable means for future training evaluation of air battle managers. Finally, the effectiveness and feasibility of the evaluation model are verified through case analysis.

show abstract

Private‐Sector Partner Selection for Public‐Private Partnership Projects Based on Improved CRITIC‐EMW Weight and GRA ‐VIKOR Method

Cited by 5 publications

References 28 publications

Suitability of Site Selection for Mountain Railway Engineering Spoil Disposal Areas from a Multi-Scenario Perspective

Suitability of Site Selection for Mountain Railway Engineering Spoil Disposal Areas from a Multi-Scenario Perspective

Simplifying the Complexity in the Problem of Choosing the Best Private-Sector Partner

Evaluation of Air Combat Control Ability Based on Eye Movement Indicators and Combination Weighting GRA-TOPSIS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About