Private video monitoring of public spaces: The construction of new invisible territories

Abstract

The idea of smart cities is to a great extent based on the belief of planners and city managers that substantial (and instrumental) use of information and communication technologies in the management of urban functions can make cities work better. This is also part of the coordinated discourse adopted by planners, managers and politicians around the world in an attempt to position their cities in the fierce competition for revenue, jobs and people. In this paper we will concentrate on gaining an understanding of informational territories built to support surveillance and control of public spaces. We seek to question this relation by making reference to several specific uses of information and communication technologies for surveillance purposes and to discuss it from the point of view of definitions of territory. Our goal is to discuss the fact that, under the ‘mantra’ of smarter cities and on the grounds of public security, there is a scattering of micro and macro informational territorial elements that overlap to undermine the meaningfulness of urban public spaces.

The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox

“…The categories that previously played a normative role in classifying and understanding space become merged and invalidated in a world where digital technologies play a dominant role in social ordering and the construction and contestation of power. Such technologies help to create an ‘intangible territorial layer made of ephemeral appropriations of space with various levels of interconnection, systemisation and complexity’ (Firmino and Duarte, 2016: 742). The blending that comes from such interconnections is reflected in studies that show how individuals often assume that virtual (or digital) space is more public than private (e.g.…”

“…The promises of smart urbanism are great, as rationalisation has the potential to make processes of economic growth and the management of public services and resources more efficient, productive and sustainable. Yet such promises currently lack full validation in the real world, and so have been interpreted as more a marketing label than a fully realised opportunity (Hollands, 2008; see also Firmino and Duarte, 2016; Vuolteenaho et al, 2015). Indeed, the most critical of scholars have criticised it for being ‘a hollow urban imaginary in search of meaning’ (Taylor Buck and While, 2017: 504; see also McFarlane, 2016).…”

Smart and Sustainable Cities: The Main Guidelines of City Statute for Increasing the Intelligence of Brazilian Cities

“…[26] shows the convergence between these concepts and those of the guideline. Several authors [91,[99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108] cite these characteristics as important for increasing the intelligence of cities.…”

Developments in the UK road transport from a smart cities perspective

“…Governments are obligated to protect citizen and their control over the active connection of local public groups, the police force, and the citizen such as the senior and disabled Neirotti et al ,2014 Level of observing has been focused by an increasing safety and security that desires to manage risks Kitchin , 2014 Safety and security features implemented with help of big data and data controls centres that joined and bind data stream collectively for example the installation of CCTV and street monitored camera are to monitor activity remotely Firmino and Duarte, 2014 Big data is a trend of utilising software tools to store data and share data collected with the use of technology. Nowadays, big data has been a tool that facilitating individual, businesses and government to discover new solutions to certain problems.…”