Privatisation of urban water service provision: the Kenyan experiment

Abstract

One of the services that have been poorly provided in the urban areas in Kenya is water and sanitation. There are many reasons, which can be attributed to poor provision of water and sanitation as undertaken by the local authorities in Kenya. The path to remedy the poor provision of water and sanitation has been charted in privatisation in the form of commercialisation. Commercialisation in Kenya was first implemented on an experimental basis in three urban areas: Nyeri, Eldoret and Nakuru. This involved formation of a publicly owned water company as an agent of the local authority. The companies formed as a result were set up and operated according to the provisions of the Companies Act chapter 486 of the Laws of Kenya. This paper looks at the genesis of privatisation of water services based on the contributions of GTZ, UWASAM and KFW to an experiment in formulating and implementing privatisation in the three urban areas. The outcome of the experiment is then compared to the current on-going exercise of water privatisation by local authorities. Privatisation of water and sanitation services is expected to solve the problem of poor and inadequate service provision that hitherto characterised urban areas. It would do this by achieving its goals of decentralisation and economic viability. However, the outcome of the experiment indicated that privatisation failed to achieve these two fundamental goals. For that matter, privatisation failed to meet its intended objectives of solving the woes of service provision in urban areas. A close examination of the current privatisation indicates that the operation has again failed to achieve its fundamental goals of decentralisation and economic viability. The failure of the current exercise in meeting the objectives of ridding the urban areas of water woes can therefore be predicted on this basis.

Revenue Generation Aspects That Influence Financial Sustainability of Public Water Utilities in Kenya: The Case of Homa Bay Water and Sewerage Company Limited

“…The information was used to examine the totality of relationship between revenue generation aspects and the utility's financial sustainability. Based on the positivist and constructivist thoughts, the investigator applied a mixed methods approach; where quantitative methods elicited information for descriptive and inferential purposes, while qualitative methods obtained detailed case analysis information for validating quantitative results (Sale, Lohfeld & Brazil, 2002;Hughes & Sharrock, 1997).…”

Challenges Facing Small and Medium Water Service Providers in Kenya: A Case of Amatsi Water Services Company, Vihiga County

“…(K'akumu & Appida, 2006) reported that local authorities interfered in the running of the water utilities that they had incorporated. WASREB cite political interference as a threat to the management and activities of WSPs (WASREB, 2015).…”

‘Our Water Supply is being Managed like a Rumshop’: Water Governance in Barbados

“…supplying water). Symptoms of poor governance identified included: unaccounted for water, lack of Water Governance in Barbados 157 metering, ineffective collection of water revenue, uneconomic tariffs, exclusion of the poor from the service, excess staff of water service provider, conflict of roles in water management and little connection to municipal sewerage network (Panayotou, 1997;K'Akumu and Appida, 2006). Problems associated with poor or inadequate provision of water services and water resources management have been the subject of investigation by a wide range of authors with a variety of explanations given.…”