2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11256-018-0470-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privatizing Benefit and Socializing Cost: Market Education as Rent Seeking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To what degree nonprofit charter schools are rent-seekers is somewhat unclear as the evidence is mostly anecdotal. Potential indicators of rent-seeking include charter schools and CMOs lobbying politicians and charter authorizers to receive greater funding, below-average teacher compensation, not always transparent payments to service providers, and reductions in services for high cost students (see Fitch & Hulgin, 2018). Whether these arguments apply for all charter schools or only describe the behavior of some operators, as charter school proponents argue (The Center for Popular Democracy, 2014), is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Charter School Spending—theoretical Arguments and Empirical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To what degree nonprofit charter schools are rent-seekers is somewhat unclear as the evidence is mostly anecdotal. Potential indicators of rent-seeking include charter schools and CMOs lobbying politicians and charter authorizers to receive greater funding, below-average teacher compensation, not always transparent payments to service providers, and reductions in services for high cost students (see Fitch & Hulgin, 2018). Whether these arguments apply for all charter schools or only describe the behavior of some operators, as charter school proponents argue (The Center for Popular Democracy, 2014), is still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Charter School Spending—theoretical Arguments and Empirical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, they are actors/local elites both formal and informal with strong power and relation capacities so that they can direct economic policies to serve the means of accumulating profits that have been determined -usually only within their internal elite network so that it often hinders mutual prosperity (Haselmann 2018). This practice is considered unnatural because it creates injustice (Fitch & Hulgin 2018), from the conspiracy of entrepreneurs and rulers (Ma'arif 2011), one of them is through legal lobbying as well as bribery and pressure (Basin et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%