Biologically active molecules can be identifi ed through the screening of small-molecule libraries. Defi ciencies in current compound collections are evidenced by the continuing decline in drugdiscovery successes. Typically, such collections are comprised of large numbers of structurally similar compounds. A general consensus has emerged that library size is not everything; library diversity, in terms of molecular structure and thus function, is crucial. Diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) aims to generate such structural diversity in an effi cient manner. Recent years have witnessed signifi cant achievements in the fi eld, which help to validate the usefulness of DOS as a tool for the discovery of novel, biologically interesting small molecules.S mall molecular mass chemical entities (so-called small molecules) have always been of interest in chemistry and biology because of their ability to exert powerful eff ects on the functions of macromolecules that comprise living systems 1 -3 . Indeed, the small-molecule modulation of protein function represents the basis for both medicinal chemistry (wherein molecules are sought to chemically modify disease states) and chemical genetics (wherein molecules are used as ' probes ' to study biological systems 3 -8 . Such chemical modulators are most commonly identifi ed by screening collections or ' libraries ' of small molecules. However, a crucial consideration is what compounds to use 3,9,10 . A general consensus has emerged that library size is not everything; library diversity, in terms of molecular structure and more importantly function, is a crucial consideration. Th e effi cient creation of functionally diverse small-molecule collections presents a formidable challenge.Traditionally, when a specifi c biological molecule or family of molecules is targeted, the compounds used in the screening process are usually selected or designed on the basis of knowledge of the target structure or the structure of known natural ligands 3,9,11 . Th e selection criteria are dramatically complicated if the subsequent screening is ' unbiased ' ; that is, when the precise nature of the biological target is unknown (for example, in a random drug-discovery screen) 4,3,12 . In such situations, the structural features required in the small molecules cannot be defi ned a priori and it can be argued that the screening of a library of compounds that has been designed to interact with one specifi c biological target (or family of related targets) is not logical, whereas the random screening of many such ' focused ' collections can be extremely time and cost demanding.In general, the identifi cation of biologically active small molecules may be aided by screening functionally diverse compound libraries (that is, libraries that display a broad range of biological activities), as it has been argued that a greater sample of the bioactive chemical universe (that is, of all bioactive molecules) increases the chance of identifying a compound with the desired properties 3,10,13,14 . As a corollary, ...