2015
DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2015.1036566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro-Poor Primr: Improving Early Literacy Skills for Children From Low-Income Families in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure presents the effect size of the impact of PRIMR on the procedural and conceptual indices compared with the average effect of PRIMR on literacy outcomes in English and Kiswahili (Piper, Jepkemei, and Kibukho 2015). These findings showed that the impact of PRIMR on mathematics was somewhat smaller than its effects on either English or Kiswahili.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This figure presents the effect size of the impact of PRIMR on the procedural and conceptual indices compared with the average effect of PRIMR on literacy outcomes in English and Kiswahili (Piper, Jepkemei, and Kibukho 2015). These findings showed that the impact of PRIMR on mathematics was somewhat smaller than its effects on either English or Kiswahili.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Previous research had shown that the first-year impact of PRIMR on literacy outcomes did differ by site and grade (Piper, Zuilkowski, and Mugenda 2014) and by poverty levels (Piper, Jepkemei, and Kibukho 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, Kenya's PRIMR program produced effect sizes between 0.3 and 0.8 SD, with double the proportion of pupils reading at the MoE's English and Kiswahili benchmarks in grades 1 and 2 (Piper et al., ; Piper, King, & Mugenda, ; Piper & Zuilkowski, ). The mathematics outcomes were somewhat smaller in size but were still statistically significant (Piper, Ralaingita, Akach, & King, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PRIMR was designed to include a set of clustered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which all showed statistically significant effects and provided the GoK with evidence regarding the specific elements of PRIMR that were most critical to program success. Similar to EGRA Plus in Liberia, the PRIMR impact evaluations indicated the success of the base program (Piper, Zuilkowski, & Mugenda, ), a particular effect among the poor (Piper, Jepkemei, & Kibukho, ), and statistically significant effects on both numeracy and literacy (Piper, Ralaingita, Akach, & King, ). Another PRIMR study compared information and communication technology (ICT) options, such as student e‐readers and tablets for teachers, and found that the base PRIMR program with modest ICT at the TAC tutor level was most effective (Piper, Zuilkowski, Kwayumba, & Strigel, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ngwaru and Oluga (2015, p. 88) study in low-resourced communities in Tanzania noted the extent to which school infrastructure and ecology including buildings, teaching learning materials and teacher characteristics reinforced literacy practices and events at home and school. Similarly, a Kenyan study by Piper et al (2015) found that poverty, literacy skills and weak instructional methods combined to drastically limit the educational opportunities for poor children.…”
Section: Literacy Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%