Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/reldis.2004.1353031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive hot spot avoidance for Web server dependability

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Redirection of incoming client requests or sessions remains active until the server load is below the threshold. Other studies, such as [4], [3], exploit a double threshold solution, where redirection is activated by a High This latter solution provides a more stable behavior, reducing the number of activation/deactivation of redirection with respect to the single threshold solution, but its higher complexity requires the tuning of the two threshold values to achieve good performance.…”
Section: B Request Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Redirection of incoming client requests or sessions remains active until the server load is below the threshold. Other studies, such as [4], [3], exploit a double threshold solution, where redirection is activated by a High This latter solution provides a more stable behavior, reducing the number of activation/deactivation of redirection with respect to the single threshold solution, but its higher complexity requires the tuning of the two threshold values to achieve good performance.…”
Section: B Request Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions concerning request redirection are usually enforced through the evaluation of the load conditions of the local server and (possibly) of its neighbors, and through the comparison of these load values against a fixed, static threshold [1], [2]. Even if this approach has been applied in several fields of ranging from network resource optimization [3] to performance improvement on a local [4], [2] and geographic scale [5], these proposals do not consider pieces of information that could improve redirection decisions, but rely only on a comparison of the server load with static thresholds. This approach has some limits: (a) it does not consider the redirection overhead, that includes the delays introduced by request forwarding and session migration; (b) it does not take into account the computational demand of a user request and, consequently, the impact of its redirection on the load of other servers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, existing strategies for redirecting load are founded on one or two thresholds for deciding about activation/deactivation [14]. An approach with fixed threshold(s) is clearly not autonomic and risks to lead the system to unstable oscillations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is self-adaptable and guarantees best stability especially when it is enriched by a probabilistic approach to decide about redirection. On the other hand, existing strategies are founded on a threshold basis for activation/deactivation [14], that is not autonomic and risks to lead the system to unstable oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them ( [17], [39], [36], [26], [37], [15]) have focused on static content. To improve the application server scalability, application programs or components [28], [2], [44] can be offloaded from the origin server.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%