2019
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive identification of query failure

Abstract: When a user fails to find any useful information to support the task at hand after issuing a query, the user experiences a query failure. Since users possess limited cognitive resources, query failures often lead to user frustration as no clear benefit is obtained from the associated search interactions. Therefore, to improve users' search experiences, we conducted a controlled‐lab study with 40 participants, seeking to explore the extent to which query failures can be proactively identified before users start… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proactive User Interface and System Design: Our study offers insights for proactive user interface and system design, which extends previous work on proactive IR [15]. Our approach involved utilizing questionnaires and specific interface tabs, yet the need for more seamless integration emerged.…”
Section: Insights and Implications For System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Proactive User Interface and System Design: Our study offers insights for proactive user interface and system design, which extends previous work on proactive IR [15]. Our approach involved utilizing questionnaires and specific interface tabs, yet the need for more seamless integration emerged.…”
Section: Insights and Implications For System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The search path and strategies of users with high performance can be leveraged to enhance other users' search results and experience under similar search tasks, cognitive states, and intents (Hassan Awadallah et al, 2014; Hendahewa & Shah, 2017; J. Liu & Shah, 2022). Users' search performance is shaped by several factors, such as domain knowledge (i.e., users' knowledge background and familiarity with the search task/topic), search expertise (i.e., technical skills and topic‐independent search experience) (Suzuki & Yamamoto, 2021), and contextual factors (J. Liu & Shah, 2019a, 2019b). Focusing on search performance, previous research suggested that good‐performing users usually have better search strategies and can effectively accumulate knowledge and cues through interactive search activities (Mao et al, 2018; Suzuki & Yamamoto, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users' search performance is shaped by several factors, such as domain knowledge (i.e., users' knowledge background and familiarity with the search task/topic), search expertise (i.e., technical skills and topic-independent search experience) (Suzuki & Yamamoto, 2021), and contextual factors (J. Liu & Shah, 2019a, 2019b. Focusing on search performance, previous research suggested that good-performing users usually have better search strategies and can effectively accumulate knowledge and cues through interactive search activities (Mao et al, 2018;Suzuki & Yamamoto, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to advancing science in understanding users, it is also critical to leverage the knowledge about users in providing adaptive and ideally proactive supports for users at early stages of search sessions [3,11,18,22]. [21] found that users' search behaviors in first query of a session can achieve the same level of accuracy in search task prediction as using whole session search data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%