2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive policies for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13], Freeman first applied probability theory in the project scheduling problem. After that, many scholars considered randomness in the scheduling process, such as activity durations (Ke and Liu , 2005 [18]; Zhu et al, 2007 [49]; Klerides and Hadjiconstantinou, 2010 [21]; Deblaere et al, 2011 [11]), task costs (Choi and et al 2004, [10]; Aytug et al 2005, [5]), resource consumption and availabilities (Lambrechts et al, 2008 [26]; Keller and Bayraksan, 2009 [19]) and so on. Expect for the stochastic factor mentioned above (objective uncertainty) which is from external cause (such as treacherous weather and equipment failure), the other one is from internal (such as the perception and dissension of decision makers) in the scheduling process, i.e., subjective uncertainty, and it can be cope with fuzzy theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], Freeman first applied probability theory in the project scheduling problem. After that, many scholars considered randomness in the scheduling process, such as activity durations (Ke and Liu , 2005 [18]; Zhu et al, 2007 [49]; Klerides and Hadjiconstantinou, 2010 [21]; Deblaere et al, 2011 [11]), task costs (Choi and et al 2004, [10]; Aytug et al 2005, [5]), resource consumption and availabilities (Lambrechts et al, 2008 [26]; Keller and Bayraksan, 2009 [19]) and so on. Expect for the stochastic factor mentioned above (objective uncertainty) which is from external cause (such as treacherous weather and equipment failure), the other one is from internal (such as the perception and dissension of decision makers) in the scheduling process, i.e., subjective uncertainty, and it can be cope with fuzzy theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these papers deal with the resource constrained project scheduling problem and its variants (see [3,9,19,22,31,32). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first contribution where both cost, completion time, and stability are investigated in the context of the DTCTP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the subjective uncertainty, many researchers are devoted to RCPSP under a fuzzy environment, such as Wang et al (2005) [14], Chen et al (2011) [2], and Masmoudi and Haït (2013) [11]. On the other hand, Ke and Liu (2005) [6], Deblaere et al (2011) [5] considered activity durations as random variable, and Choi and et al (2004) [4], Aytug et al (2005) [1] deemed task costs as stochastic. However, the subjective and objective uncertainty are considered as separate aspects, but we may face a hybrid uncertain environment in the practical RCPSP which fuzziness and randomness co-exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%