2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive versus reactive apparel brands in sustainability: Influences on brand loyalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The consumer's apparel sustainability knowledge was measured on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (5), adopting from Park and Kim (2016). Two items assess consumer knowledge of social responsibility issues in the apparel industry, including the statements "I am informed about child labour/sweatshop issues in the fashion apparel manufacturing business" and "I am knowledgeable about social equity issues (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consumer's apparel sustainability knowledge was measured on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (5), adopting from Park and Kim (2016). Two items assess consumer knowledge of social responsibility issues in the apparel industry, including the statements "I am informed about child labour/sweatshop issues in the fashion apparel manufacturing business" and "I am knowledgeable about social equity issues (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability knowledge is frequently a prerequisite to engaging in pro-environmental behaviours. Only when consumers know enough about sustainability can they be likely to purchase sustainable products (Harris et al, 2016;Jensen, 2002;McNeill and Moore, 2015;Park and Kim, 2016;Paul et al, 2016). Consumers with knowledge and concerns regarding environmental and societal issues would be motivated to purchase green and fair trade apparel (Goworek et al, 2012;Hwang et al, 2015;Rothenberg and Matthews, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, McNeill and Moore (2015) argue that even those consumers who express strong concern about environmental and social issues admit that they continuously engage in the consumption of fast fashion products due to their desire for updated fashion. Similarly, Park and Kim (2016) argue that, despite their awareness of the negative aspects of fast fashion products, consumers may still enjoy stylish, inexpensive fashion items. The current study builds upon these previous findings and investigates potential linkage between consumers' perception toward a fast fashion brand's TBL sustainability and their brand relationship with the fast fashion product.…”
Section: Fast Fashion Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por meio dos critérios de inclusão da RBS, explicitados no tópico "procedimentos metodológicos", foram selecionados quatro artigos (NIINIMÄKI;HASSI, 2011;LAPOLLA;SANDERS, 2015;PARK;KIM, 2016;POLDNER;DENTONI;IVANOVA, 2017). Os artigos excluídos não atendiam aos critérios de inclusão, eram repetidos ou abordavam outras áreas do conhecimento.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified