2000
DOI: 10.1177/02783640022067922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva

Abstract: This paper describes Minerva, an interactive tour-guide robot that was successfully deployed in a Smithsonian museum. Minerva's software is pervasively probabilistic, relying on explicit representations of uncertainty in perception and control. During 2 weeks of operation, the robot interacted with thousands of people, both in the museum and through the Web, traversing more than 44 km at speeds of up to 163 cm/sec in the unmodified museum.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
230
0
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(104 reference statements)
1
230
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Monte Carlo localization allowed the Minerva robotic museum guide to operate for 44 km over 2 weeks [71]. More recently it has been used by Nuske et al to localize an AUV relative to a marine structure using a camera [59], exploiting GPU-accelerated image formation to facilitate large particle sets.…”
Section: Simultaneous Localization and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo localization allowed the Minerva robotic museum guide to operate for 44 km over 2 weeks [71]. More recently it has been used by Nuske et al to localize an AUV relative to a marine structure using a camera [59], exploiting GPU-accelerated image formation to facilitate large particle sets.…”
Section: Simultaneous Localization and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheeled robots, for example, have already been deployed as museum tour guides or on large fairs [5], [6], [7], [8]. The main focus in these systems, however, was reliable, collisionfree navigation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are examples of learning in robots that are non-categorical (e.g., visuo-motor control [35]) and implicitly categorical (e.g., systems that learn to avoid obstacles [36]). Further, localisation and navigation systems can be trained to associate features with locations (e.g., [37]). However, it could be argued that this is only mapping features to categories in a categorisation system that the robot was given, and falls well short of human-style high-level classiÿcation.…”
Section: Where Do Categories Come From?mentioning
confidence: 99%