2013
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2012.2224378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Analysis of a Generalized Perturb and Observe Algorithm Featuring Robust Operation in the Presence of Power Curve Traps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the connection of bypass diodes will change the uniform current-voltage (I-V) and power-voltage (P-V) characteristics of the module, resulting in multiple peaks [1]. To maximize the efficiency of the module, it is necessary to track The conventional MPPT methods such as perturb-and-observe (P&O) [2], [3], hill-climbing (HC) [4] and incremental conductance (INC) [5] essentially rely on determining the gradient of the power with respect to the current, voltage or duty cycle using the perturbation method for tracking movement [6]. Consequently, the main drawback of these methods is that they cannot differentiate between a local maximum point (LMP) and the GMP, and the attained point may be a LMP, leading to power losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the connection of bypass diodes will change the uniform current-voltage (I-V) and power-voltage (P-V) characteristics of the module, resulting in multiple peaks [1]. To maximize the efficiency of the module, it is necessary to track The conventional MPPT methods such as perturb-and-observe (P&O) [2], [3], hill-climbing (HC) [4] and incremental conductance (INC) [5] essentially rely on determining the gradient of the power with respect to the current, voltage or duty cycle using the perturbation method for tracking movement [6]. Consequently, the main drawback of these methods is that they cannot differentiate between a local maximum point (LMP) and the GMP, and the attained point may be a LMP, leading to power losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalised P&O (GPO) is a method designed to address the tendency of the P&O method to become trapped in local power curve traps that arise due to measurement noise [35]. In the GPO method, the measured power at the current step is compared with a previously measured power, not necessarily the most recent, based on some scaling factor a 1 \1.…”
Section: Hill Climbing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P&O method converged in three of the six test cases considered. In some of the test cases it became clear that the P&O method had become trapped in a local power trap [54] as the method continued to oscillate around a point far from any MPP. There were also several cases where the method started to track in the wrong direction as the environmental conditions changed.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%