2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77050-3_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Analysis of the Degree Bounded Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also defined a canonical super-additive boundary functional that well-approximates dbMST [29,Lemmas 3 and 4]. This, together with Proposition 2.1 proves that dbMST is near-additive.…”
Section: Proposition 71 Dbmst Is a Smooth Sub-additive And Near-addmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have also defined a canonical super-additive boundary functional that well-approximates dbMST [29,Lemmas 3 and 4]. This, together with Proposition 2.1 proves that dbMST is near-additive.…”
Section: Proposition 71 Dbmst Is a Smooth Sub-additive And Near-addmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Proof The smoothness and sub-additivity properties have been proved by Srivastav and Werth [29]. They have also defined a canonical super-additive boundary functional that well-approximates dbMST [29,Lemmas 3 and 4].…”
Section: Proposition 71 Dbmst Is a Smooth Sub-additive And Near-addmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We now consider the Euclidean functionals MSTk(X) defined as the minimum length of a spanning tree of scriptX whose vertices all have degree k. It was shown in that MSTk(X)βMSTkdnd1d for each k , and we prove separation of these asymptotic formulas as follows: Theorem We have that βTSPd=βMST2d>βMST3d>>βMSTτ(d)d=βMSTd for all d .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(Note that τ (d) ≤ τ (d), and in particular, τ (2) = 5.) We prove: We now consider the Euclidean functionals MST k (X ) defined as the minimum length of a spanning tree of X whose vertices all have degree ≤ k. It was shown in [26] that MST k (X ) ∼ β d MST k n d−1 d for each k, and we prove separation of these asymptotic formulas as follows: Theorem 1.2. We have that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%