2015
DOI: 10.1680/geng.14.00062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic analysis of tunnel loads using variance reduction

Abstract: The selection of input parameters for the numerical modelling of geotechnical structures is problematic due to their variability and uncertainty. Generally, parametric studies are required to evaluate the impact of input parameters on the modelling results. The utilisation of various statistical methods can bring significant benefits, such as probabilistic distributions of the modelling outputs and the probability of failure. This paper presents a variance reduction method known as ‘Latin hypercube sampling'. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, one important fact is overlooked. Numerical analyses are only approximation of real behaviour and are highly dependent on the input parameters [9,10]. One area, which can affect the calculated results, is the correct choice of the material model [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, one important fact is overlooked. Numerical analyses are only approximation of real behaviour and are highly dependent on the input parameters [9,10]. One area, which can affect the calculated results, is the correct choice of the material model [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sixth paper (Svoboda and Hilar, 2015) describes a method for understanding the probabilistic variance of soil properties with reference to the stresses acting on the Brusnice tunnel in the Czech Republic. The 'Latin hypercube sampling' (LHS) method is a statistical tool that can be used within an FE framework that is more computationally efficient than the Monte-Carlo method, reducing the number of simulations required to the order of tens or low hundreds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%