2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.i010271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Approach to NASA Langley Research Center Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already proved in the previous example, only the input directly involved in the determination of the center of the mass of the samples, namely ๐œƒ 1 and ๐œƒ 4 herein, can be updated with the Euclidian distance metric. Similar histograms or PDFs, especially for the variances and correlation, are obtained in the works of Patelli et al [14] and Ghanem et al [15], implying the variance information is difficult to be updated by the classical Bayesian approaches with classic distance metrics.…”
Section: Comparison With the Published Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As already proved in the previous example, only the input directly involved in the determination of the center of the mass of the samples, namely ๐œƒ 1 and ๐œƒ 4 herein, can be updated with the Euclidian distance metric. Similar histograms or PDFs, especially for the variances and correlation, are obtained in the works of Patelli et al [14] and Ghanem et al [15], implying the variance information is difficult to be updated by the classical Bayesian approaches with classic distance metrics.…”
Section: Comparison With the Published Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Ref. [14][15][16], do not converge to a unique solution. Nevertheless, the proposed ABC approach with the Bhattacharyya distance metric demonstrates its ability on variance updating and capturing the complex non-linear relationship between inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Comparison With the Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations