1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-9958(63)90290-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
357
0
4

Year Published

1966
1966
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 621 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
357
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Rabin's probabilistic automata [27] can be modelled as weighted T-automata over the semiring [0, ∞) under the standard arithmetic operations. As we mentioned in Example 3.4), finitary probability distributions form a monad, which allows for a slightly more elegant formalization: we take the finitary distribution monad as T and B = [0, 1].…”
Section: T-automata: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabin's probabilistic automata [27] can be modelled as weighted T-automata over the semiring [0, ∞) under the standard arithmetic operations. As we mentioned in Example 3.4), finitary probability distributions form a monad, which allows for a slightly more elegant formalization: we take the finitary distribution monad as T and B = [0, 1].…”
Section: T-automata: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes include the probabilistic automata in the sense of [20]. -Alternating processes: every state that enables a non-Dirac transition enables only that transition.…”
Section: The Nplts Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider classical probabilistic finite automata (PFA) [21,20]. A PFA over alphabet A is a tuple A = (Q, ι, Acc, P) where Q is the finite set of states, ι ∈ Q is the initial state, and Acc ⊆ Q is the set of final states.…”
Section: Probabilistic Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, they may make a probabilistic decision depending on the input letter, like (reactive) probabilistic automata [20]. The latter go back to Rabin [21] and are an object of ongoing research considering decision problems such as emptiness, language equivalence [24,28,9,10,18], and the value 1 problem [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%