2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44584-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Bisimulation: Naturally on Distributions

Abstract: Abstract. In contrast to the usual understanding of probabilistic systems as stochastic processes, recently these systems have also been regarded as transformers of probabilities. In this paper, we give a natural definition of strong bisimulation for probabilistic systems corresponding to this view that treats probability distributions as first-class citizens. Our definition applies in the same way to discrete systems as well as to systems with uncountable state and action spaces. Several examples demonstrate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systems exhibiting both nondeterministic and probabilistic behaviour are abundantly used in verification [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], AI [8], [9], [10], and studied from semantics perspective [11], [12], [13]. Probability is needed to quantitatively model uncertainty and belief, whereas nondeterminism enables modelling of incomplete information, unknown environment, implementation freedom, or concurrency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems exhibiting both nondeterministic and probabilistic behaviour are abundantly used in verification [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], AI [8], [9], [10], and studied from semantics perspective [11], [12], [13]. Probability is needed to quantitatively model uncertainty and belief, whereas nondeterminism enables modelling of incomplete information, unknown environment, implementation freedom, or concurrency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we enrich the states with an output weight that is used in the definition of the language semantics. Our language semantics is coarser than probabilistic (convex) bisimilarity [26] and bisimilarity on distributions [16]. In fact, in contrast to the hardness and undecidability results we proved for probabilistic language equivalence, bisimilarity on distributions can be shown to be decidable [16] with the help of convexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The algorithm in [24] is exponential in the worst case. We will work out whether or not more efficient algorithms exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, all weak transitions can be handled in the same way as non-deterministic strong transitions in [24]. Not surprisingly, this will cause an exponential blow-up.…”
Section: Properties Of Late Distribution Bisimilaritymentioning
confidence: 96%