2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic design equations for the shear capacity of RC members with FRP internal shear reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the comparative analyses of procedures included in the design recommendations ACI 440.1R-15 [5], Canadian CSA-S806-12 [8], Japanese JSCE-97 [9] and Italian CNR-DT 203/2006 [10] are presented in Table 3. The results of the comparative analyses of the algorithms proposed by Tottori et al [15], Michaluk et al [16], Deitz et al [17], El-Sayed et al [18], Wegian et al [19], Nehdi et al [20], Hoult et al [21], Razaqpur et al [22], Alam [23], Kara [24], Kurth [25], Jang et al [26], Lignola et al [27], Valivonis et al [28], Thomas et al [29] and Hamid et al [30] are presented in Table 4. 2), ( 7), ( 13) and (17).…”
Section: Verification Of the Available Models And Design Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the comparative analyses of procedures included in the design recommendations ACI 440.1R-15 [5], Canadian CSA-S806-12 [8], Japanese JSCE-97 [9] and Italian CNR-DT 203/2006 [10] are presented in Table 3. The results of the comparative analyses of the algorithms proposed by Tottori et al [15], Michaluk et al [16], Deitz et al [17], El-Sayed et al [18], Wegian et al [19], Nehdi et al [20], Hoult et al [21], Razaqpur et al [22], Alam [23], Kara [24], Kurth [25], Jang et al [26], Lignola et al [27], Valivonis et al [28], Thomas et al [29] and Hamid et al [30] are presented in Table 4. 2), ( 7), ( 13) and (17).…”
Section: Verification Of the Available Models And Design Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the model is generally not conservative, however the predictability is quite high (point cloud aligns along 45° line) and the definition of partial safety factors, for design purposes, requires a further step (i.e. a statistical regression based calibration, like as in Lignola et al 2014c, to account for all sources of uncertainties, apart the model equation) out of the scope of present work.…”
Section: Figure 5 Sensitivity Analysis On Parameter Nlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of FRP-RC beams, the deformation and crack width are larger than that of the steel RC beams at the same applying loads. Consequently, the shear resistance provided by both uncracked concrete in the compression zone and aggregated interlock is smaller, which results in a lower shear resistance contribution provided by concrete [10,11]. Additionally, bending FRP rebars to form stirrups significantly reduces the strength at the bend zones due to their anisotropic properties, thus resulting in a lower stirrup shear resistance contribution [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%