2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic estimation of flexural loading capacity of existing RC structures based on observational corrosion-induced crack width distribution using machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the epoxy coating, the R c values of WO 3 , WO 2.9 , WO 2.72 , and WO 2 coatings were increased by 48.67, 192.90, 413.00, and 155.09%, respectively. The larger the R c value, the better the properties to prevent the invasion of water and aggressive ions. , The defects, pores, and other artifact in coatings were cemented with the help of WO 3– x MVMOs; thus, the diffusion of aqueous corrosive ions was restricted and the shielding properties of the coatings were enhanced. The contact angle test (Figure S1) revealed that the WO 2.72 coating had the largest contact angle and the smallest surface energy, indicating the difficulty of WO 2.72 coating for water and Cl – to penetrate into the surface, thus mentioning the corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the epoxy coating, the R c values of WO 3 , WO 2.9 , WO 2.72 , and WO 2 coatings were increased by 48.67, 192.90, 413.00, and 155.09%, respectively. The larger the R c value, the better the properties to prevent the invasion of water and aggressive ions. , The defects, pores, and other artifact in coatings were cemented with the help of WO 3– x MVMOs; thus, the diffusion of aqueous corrosive ions was restricted and the shielding properties of the coatings were enhanced. The contact angle test (Figure S1) revealed that the WO 2.72 coating had the largest contact angle and the smallest surface energy, indicating the difficulty of WO 2.72 coating for water and Cl – to penetrate into the surface, thus mentioning the corrosion resistance.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a risk system should be developed for every type of tunnel support. The structural capacity and risk with respect to cracks in reinforced cast concrete have been well studied, see, e.g., [ 92 , 93 , 94 ]. However, for fiber-reinforced concrete, there is a lack of research on experimental testing and numerical simulation focusing on the effect of cracks.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Safety Of Damaged Concrete Liningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning is a field that has received increased attention from researchers studying steel corrosion in concrete and has been shown to be a promising approach for predicting damage in reinforced concrete structures experiencing corrosion. 51,115,116 Some studies even have used machine learning to predict CT or corrosion initiation in concrete structures. 117,118 However, these machine learning approaches rely on existing collected data on CT that are still subject to the challenges associated with the CT concept and cannot address the big questions that are described in this paper.…”
Section: Improved Approaches To Forecasting Corrosion Of Steel In Con...mentioning
confidence: 99%