2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-020-02058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic evaluation of the seismic stability of infinite submarine slopes integrating the enhanced Newmark method and random field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the traditional Newmark displacement approach usually ignores the effect of dynamic pore water pressure (DPWP), which is an important parameter for significant damage to pore pressure‐prone soil slopes 23–25 . For the seismic displacement analysis of soil slopes using Newmark model and the like, there are also some previous investigations that consider the DPWP, which showed that the yield acceleration will degrade and seismic displacement increases significantly in saturated sandy soil slopes as a result of the co‐seismic DPWP buildup 26–30 . Huang et al 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the traditional Newmark displacement approach usually ignores the effect of dynamic pore water pressure (DPWP), which is an important parameter for significant damage to pore pressure‐prone soil slopes 23–25 . For the seismic displacement analysis of soil slopes using Newmark model and the like, there are also some previous investigations that consider the DPWP, which showed that the yield acceleration will degrade and seismic displacement increases significantly in saturated sandy soil slopes as a result of the co‐seismic DPWP buildup 26–30 . Huang et al 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] For the seismic displacement analysis of soil slopes using Newmark model and the like, there are also some previous investigations that consider the DPWP, which showed that the yield acceleration will degrade and seismic displacement increases significantly in saturated sandy soil slopes as a result of the co-seismic DPWP buildup. [26][27][28][29][30] Huang et al 31 investigated the influence of changing groundwater table and time-dependent DPWP on the dynamic stability of unsaturated sandy slope using finite element modeling and shaking table test, and the results demonstrated that the seismic failure of slope with high groundwater is mainly caused by the water flow around the slope toe where the DPWP is the largest. However, the above-mentioned studies only consider the DPWP accumulation caused by horizontal ground motion and ignore the contribution of the vertical one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qin and Chian (2020) assessed the seismic stability of a reinforced slope using the quasi-dynamic approach. The seismic stability of an underwater slope was assessed by Yang et al (2021) using a modified version of the Newmark technique. Srilatha et al (2013) conducted a comparative study of unreinforced and reinforced soil slopes by a shaking table test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of the geological-geotechnical processes that lead to hazardous conditions, particularly seismic-induced landslides, is a necessary element of risk assessment in offshore oil, gas or renewable energy projects (Borges et al, 2020). Recognizing the role of earthquakes as a trigger of submarine landslides, researchers have made significant contributions to the evaluation and understanding of the seismic stability of submarine slopes (Locat and Lee, 2000;Rodriguez Ochoa et al, 2015;Brink et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2017b;Collico et al, 2020;Yang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%