2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1821)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Lifetime-Oriented Multiobjective Optimization of Bridge Maintenance: Combination of Maintenance Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Probabilistic models associated to service life prediction of wall claddings are extremely useful to the cost optimization of maintenance actions during buildings life cycle [56][57][58]. An accurate optimization of maintenance actions requires a balanced consideration of both the claddings performance and the total cost accrued over the entire life-cycle [59,60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic models associated to service life prediction of wall claddings are extremely useful to the cost optimization of maintenance actions during buildings life cycle [56][57][58]. An accurate optimization of maintenance actions requires a balanced consideration of both the claddings performance and the total cost accrued over the entire life-cycle [59,60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective functions representing the target requirements for the optimal design are generally related to the cost of the structure (Frangopol 1999), including the initial construction cost and the costs of maintenance, repair and demolition, as well as to additional structural performance indicators (Furuta et al 2006, 2011, Frangopol & Liu 2007) such as safety, robustness, and redundancy, among others. The design variables may include the geometrical and mechanical properties of the structural system (Frangopol et al 1997b, Estes & Frangopol 2001b, Biondini & Marchiondelli 2008, Biondini & Frangopol 2009, Kwon & Frangopol 2010, 2011, as well as the time and reliability increments of maintenance and repair interventions (Frangopol et al 2002, Kong & Frangopol 2003b, Okasha and Frangopol 2009, Neves & Frangopol 2006a, 2006b.…”
Section: Life-cycle Reliability-based Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant advances have been accomplished in the fields of modeling, analysis, maintenance, repair, and design of deteriorating civil engineering systems (Frangopol 1999, Enright & Frangopol 1998a, 1998b, Frangopol & Furuta 2001, Frangopol et al 2004a, 2004b, 2008, Ellingwood 2005, 2011, Estes & Frangopol 2001a, Nowak & Frangopol 2005, Cho et al 2007, Biondini & Frangopol 2008a, Biondini 2009, Chen et al 2010, Furuta et al 2010, Biondini & Frangopol 2011, Strauss et al 2013, Frangopol & Biondini 2013 and novel approaches to lifecycle reliability assessment, maintenance planning, and optimal design of structural systems have been proposed (Mori & Ellingwood 1994a, 1994b, Frangopol 1995, Frangopol et al 1997a, 1997b, 2002, Fu & Frangopol 1999a, 1999b, Frangopol & Das 1999, Furuta et al 2004, Ciampoli & Ellingwood 2002, Enright & Frangopol 1999a, 1999b, Estes & Frangopol 1999, Frangopol & Maute 2003, Kong & Frangopol 2003b, Biondini et al 2004, 2006a, 2006b, 2008, 2011, Fr...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese wird in Hinblick auf steigende budgetäre Beschränkungen in der Neuerrichtung, der Erhaltung und der Instandhaltung von Infrastrukturen zunehmend relevant [1].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified