2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.16932
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Map Matching for Robust Inertial Navigation Aiding

Abstract: Robust aiding of inertial navigation systems in GNSS-denied environments is critical for the removal of accumulated navigation error caused by the drift and bias inherent in inertial sensors. One way to perform such an aiding uses matching of geophysical measurements, such as gravimetry, gravity gradiometry or magnetometry, with a known geo-referenced map. Although simple in concept, this map matching procedure is challenging: the measurements themselves are noisy; their associated spatial location is uncertai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here demonstrate the full potential of matter-wave inertial sensors for future quantum-aided navigation, either by using the QuAT output to directly determine a vehicle's position or by providing strapdown operation for gravity mapping (14,21) or gravity matching-aided navigation (49,50). They can also be used to reduce the bias drift on the local acceleration readings and thus relieve the constraint on Schuler, Foucault, or other Earth-periodic oscillation errors (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The results presented here demonstrate the full potential of matter-wave inertial sensors for future quantum-aided navigation, either by using the QuAT output to directly determine a vehicle's position or by providing strapdown operation for gravity mapping (14,21) or gravity matching-aided navigation (49,50). They can also be used to reduce the bias drift on the local acceleration readings and thus relieve the constraint on Schuler, Foucault, or other Earth-periodic oscillation errors (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%