2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2008.4650952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic mapping of dynamic obstacles using Markov chains for replanning in dynamic environments

Abstract: Robots acting in populated environments must be capable of safe but also time efficient navigation. Trying to completely avoid regions resulting from worst case predictions of the obstacle dynamics may leave no free space for a robot to move, especially in environments with high dynamic. This work presents an algorithm for a "soft" risk mapping of dynamic objects leaving the complete space free of static objects for path planning. Markov Chains are used to model the dynamics of moving persons and predict their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By including more information, e.g., (i) obstacles are not adversary and will try to avoid collisions, (ii) certain obstacles such as humans may move away over time and (iii) there are no flying obstacles, these assumptions can be relaxed to result in more efficient robot navigation. The representation can be improved by adding explicit obstacle models of, e.g., humans as proposed in Philippsen et al (2006), Philippsen et al (2008) and Rohrmüller et al (2008), but also of static parts of the environment, e.g., walls. By discriminating in obstacle representations, the probability of their presence can be modeled separately and thus more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By including more information, e.g., (i) obstacles are not adversary and will try to avoid collisions, (ii) certain obstacles such as humans may move away over time and (iii) there are no flying obstacles, these assumptions can be relaxed to result in more efficient robot navigation. The representation can be improved by adding explicit obstacle models of, e.g., humans as proposed in Philippsen et al (2006), Philippsen et al (2008) and Rohrmüller et al (2008), but also of static parts of the environment, e.g., walls. By discriminating in obstacle representations, the probability of their presence can be modeled separately and thus more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some approaches explicitly model the uncertainty that arises due to unpredictable moving obstacles, e.g., humans (Philippsen et al 2006(Philippsen et al , 2008Rohrmüller et al 2008). Moving obstacles are extracted from subsequent sensor readings and their position and velocity is estimated to obtain a probabilistic model that resembles the risk of collision.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Koppula and Saxena [23] anticipate high-level movement using a temporal conditional random field. Markov chains are used to model human dynamics in [24], and probabilistic reachability analysis, based on the dynamics obtained, is used in a collision avoidance algorithm. Ding et al [25] present another probabilistic prediction of the human occupancy using a hidden Markov model (HMM).…”
Section: B Probabilistic Motion Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Hidden Markov Models [6] and Markov chains [7] can be used to find probable movements and then calculate the most likely occupancy accordingly [8]. Though these methods work well for most human behaviour, unusual movements like reflex movements, tripping, or grabbing falling objects, may not occur in the training data and may not be accounted for.…”
Section: A Human Motion Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%