2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2009)14:3(223)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Modeling of Floodwater Level for Dam Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the initial reservoir level could have been probabilistically assessed from observed reservoir levels' time series [30,31] or from regular operation simulation [32]. The spillway reliability can be assessed through different methodologies as a fault tree analysis combined with an expert judgment [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the initial reservoir level could have been probabilistically assessed from observed reservoir levels' time series [30,31] or from regular operation simulation [32]. The spillway reliability can be assessed through different methodologies as a fault tree analysis combined with an expert judgment [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the aim of simplifying the case studies, the initial level was considered equal to the maximum level (the top of conservation pool, TCP) that could be reached during the ordinary operating conditions (prior to a flood event) for all events. Such consideration is a practice commonly implemented in dam design (Carvajal et al, 2009). Finally, for each case study, ensembles of 1000 flash flood events were generated, with a hyetograph duration varying from one half of the time of concentration (tc) to three times tc for the respective basins.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this comparison project, 19 the SHYREG method was found to be the most stable (ability to yield similar estimates when different data 20 are used for calibration) and one of the most reliable methods tested (Arnaud et al, 2016). Moreover, this 21 method provides realistic flood scenarios directly used for dam design (Carvajal et al, 2009) and takes into 22 account the non-stationarity of phenomena much better (Cantet et al, 2011). These advantages make it a 23 very valuable method, but knowledge of its uncertainties is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%