2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.g002217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Optical and Radar Initial Orbit Determination

Abstract: Future space surveillance requires dealing with uncertainties directly in the initial orbit determination phase. We propose an approach based on Taylor differential algebra to both solve the initial orbit determination (IOD) problem and to map uncertainties from the observables space into the orbital elements space. This is achieved by approximating in Taylor series the general formula for probability density function (pdf ) mapping through nonlinear transformations. In this way the mapping is obtained in an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This map is generally valid in the zonal problem when orbits with limited eccentricity are considered, such that the precession of the argument of perigee causes limited deviations from the expansion point (i.e., the fixed point). In Wittig et al [38] and Armellin and Lizia [32] it was illustrated that it was possible to estimate the size (the order of magnitude) of the region in which the truncation error of the Taylor approximation was lower than a prescribed value relying exclusively on the use of the coefficients of the map. However, in this work we evaluate the accuracy of the Taylor representation by numerically validating the results, as this method provides a more precise assessment and it represents a viable approach during the mission design phases.…”
Section: B High-order Poincaré Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This map is generally valid in the zonal problem when orbits with limited eccentricity are considered, such that the precession of the argument of perigee causes limited deviations from the expansion point (i.e., the fixed point). In Wittig et al [38] and Armellin and Lizia [32] it was illustrated that it was possible to estimate the size (the order of magnitude) of the region in which the truncation error of the Taylor approximation was lower than a prescribed value relying exclusively on the use of the coefficients of the map. However, in this work we evaluate the accuracy of the Taylor representation by numerically validating the results, as this method provides a more precise assessment and it represents a viable approach during the mission design phases.…”
Section: B High-order Poincaré Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation shows up when searching for relative motion with large amplitudes, e.g. when δr = 0.11 is used (note that δr ≈ 1 is the estimated order of magnitude at which the truncation error of the 6-th order expansion of the Poincaré map is ≈ 10 −8 , according to the coefficient-based method presented in Armellin and Lizia [32]). This is clearly shown in the top panels of Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Refinement Of Large Amplitude Relative Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To include deep-space maneuvers, it is thus necessary to study how a perturbation of the position vector when p max > 1 affects the total mission ∆v. Although the study of the inclusion of deep space maneuvers is beyond the scope of this work, in the following we provide a procedure to exploit DA computation to expand the solution of the perturbed Lambert problem with respect to a perturbation in both the initial and final position vectors (building on the algorithm presented in [26]). We start from the solution of the perturbed Lambert problem, i.e.…”
Section: Expansion Of the Solution Of The Multi-revolution Perturbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is not found in the deterministic approach, where a function may be expressed in another state without any restriction. Different authors follow the probabilistic approach, such as Armellin and Di Lizia (2016), Fujimoto (2013), DeMars and Jah (2013). All three of them use a different approach: the first paper uses differential algebra (DA), the second one maps the AR into Delaunay variables, while the third uses Gaussian mixture methods (GMMs), where a generic PDF over the AR is approximated as the sum of Gaussian PDFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%