2023
DOI: 10.1002/aic.18071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic predictions for partial least squares using bootstrap

Abstract: Modeling the uncertainty in partial least squares (PLS) is made difficult because of the nonlinear effect of the observed data on the latent space that the method finds.We present an approach, based on bootstrapping, that automatically accounts for these nonlinearities in the parameter uncertainty, allowing us to equally well represent confidence intervals for points lying close to or far away from the latent space.To show the opportunities of this approach, we develop applications in determining the Design Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, the use of RMSEP is commonly utilized in this regard. , Alternative/complementary metrics for accuracy, such as root-mean-square error of calibration, or cross validation and/or bias are conceivable. These measures are sufficient for understanding the average errors in a data set; however they should not be interpreted as an estimate for the uncertainty of a specific prediction at a new input . Moreover, use of these measures ignores the fact that errors can come from different distributions that have the same mean error but different shapes …”
Section: Latent Variable Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, the use of RMSEP is commonly utilized in this regard. , Alternative/complementary metrics for accuracy, such as root-mean-square error of calibration, or cross validation and/or bias are conceivable. These measures are sufficient for understanding the average errors in a data set; however they should not be interpreted as an estimate for the uncertainty of a specific prediction at a new input . Moreover, use of these measures ignores the fact that errors can come from different distributions that have the same mean error but different shapes …”
Section: Latent Variable Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures are sufficient for understanding the average errors in a data set; however they should not be interpreted as an estimate for the uncertainty of a specific prediction at a new input. 39 Moreover, use of these measures ignores the fact that errors can come from different distributions that have the same mean error but different shapes. 40 Precision can be measured with repeatability, i.e., standard deviation of repeated measurements of the same sample, where the sample is not moved during spectral acquisition.…”
Section: Validation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, creating an accurate process model can be intimidating and impractical, as it relies heavily on extensive process knowledge and requires frequent model adaptation to changes in process dynamics. As an alternative, data-driven approaches have been developed to speed up the design process . These methods typically rely on large amounts of historical or experimental data and can generally be classified into two categories: deterministic and probabilistic methods, the former does not consider model uncertainty whereas the latter does …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%