2001
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic relations between words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 560 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a basic relationship between reduction and probability has long been established (e.g., Jespersen, 1922;Zipf, 1929), this relationship has more recently become a central concern in the field, dubbed the 'Probabilistic Reduction Hypothesis ' in Jurafsky et al (2001) The idea is supported by findings that show that frequent words and words that are highly predictable in a certain context tend to be reduced in terms of their phonetic duration, and/or with respect to their segmental content. Such effects are often seen as a rational use of resources from an information-theoretic perspective: Highly probable words may be easier to retrieve for speakers during planning and easier to recover for listeners in perception (cf.…”
Section: Variability and Probabilistic Reductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While a basic relationship between reduction and probability has long been established (e.g., Jespersen, 1922;Zipf, 1929), this relationship has more recently become a central concern in the field, dubbed the 'Probabilistic Reduction Hypothesis ' in Jurafsky et al (2001) The idea is supported by findings that show that frequent words and words that are highly predictable in a certain context tend to be reduced in terms of their phonetic duration, and/or with respect to their segmental content. Such effects are often seen as a rational use of resources from an information-theoretic perspective: Highly probable words may be easier to retrieve for speakers during planning and easier to recover for listeners in perception (cf.…”
Section: Variability and Probabilistic Reductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…CSD has been found to be affected by word frequency in several studies that explore probabilistic reduction in word-final coronal stops (e.g., Bybee, 2000;Coetzee & Kawahara, 2013;Gregory et al, 1999;Jurafsky et al, 2001) and word-medial coronal stops (Raymond et al, 2006). A recurring finding is that CSD is more likely to apply in frequent words compared to infrequent words (see also Gahl & Garsney, 2006;Guy et al, 2008;Pluymaekers et al, 2005).…”
Section: Variability and Probabilistic Reductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A growing body of studies report phonetic and phonological reduction of frequent and/or predictable words and segments, which cannot simply be attributed to fast articulation rates (e.g., Aylett & Turk, 2006;Baese-Berk & Goldrick, 2009;Baran et al, 1977;Bybee, 2000;Ernestus, 2000;Fosler-Lussier & Morgan, 1999;Frank & Jaeger, 2008;Fricke, 2013;Gahl et al, 2012;Jurafsky et al, 2001;Lieberman, 1963;Munson, 2007). Where it is predictable, voicing specifications may not need to be as clearly signaled by VOT for successful communication, considering the facilitative effects of listener expectations on word recognition (e.g., Rubenstein & Pollack, 1963) and listener tolerance for acoustic mismatches in reduced speech (Brouwer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is lexical predictability, which is where speakers produce certain words with shorter durations and/or greater phonological reduction when they are predictable. For example, speakers tend to use shorter pronunciations for frequent words, as well as words that are highly probable given the preceding and/or following word (Aylett & Turk, 2004;Bell et al, 2009;Frank & Jaeger, 2008;Gahl & Garnsey, 2004;Gahl et al, 2012;Jurafsky et al, 1998;Jurafsky et al, 2001). Another example comes from Lieberman (1963), where the word "nine" in the common maxim, "a stitch in time saves nine" has less emphasis (lower intelligibility) than in, "the next number you will hear is nine."…”
Section: Does Thematic Role Predictability Affect Duration?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When words are redundant with the context, they are easier to retrieve and are pronounced with shorter durations (e.g., Aylett & Turk, 2004;Bell et al, 2009;Gahl et al, 2012;Jurafsky et al, 2001). Bell et al (2009) argued that the contextual probability of a word affects the speed at which it is accessed, and speakers utilize word duration as a mechanism to coordinate between planning and articulation, in order to maintain fluent delivery.…”
Section: The Lexical Facilitation and Planning Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%