1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-48654-1_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Simulations for Probabilistic Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
683
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(690 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
683
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probabilistic automata (PAs) [35,36], and the closely related model of Markov decision processes (MDPs), are common formalisms for modelling systems that exhibit both probabilistic and nondeterministic behaviour. We focus here on PAs, which subsume MDPs and are particularly well suited for compositional reasoning about probabilistic systems [35].…”
Section: Modelling and Verification Of Probabilistic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probabilistic automata (PAs) [35,36], and the closely related model of Markov decision processes (MDPs), are common formalisms for modelling systems that exhibit both probabilistic and nondeterministic behaviour. We focus here on PAs, which subsume MDPs and are particularly well suited for compositional reasoning about probabilistic systems [35].…”
Section: Modelling and Verification Of Probabilistic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we discuss some recent developments in the area of automated compositional verification techniques for probabilistic systems, focusing on assume-guarantee verification techniques [29,21] for probabilistic automata [35,36], a natural model for compositional reasoning. When aiming to develop fully automated verification techniques, an important question that arises is how to devise suitable assumptions about system components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…weak probabilistic bisimulation) defined later. Some definitions in this subsection are motivated by or borrowed directly from [29] and [30] where classical probabilistic processes were considered. Definition 16 An execution fragment f = C 0 α 1 C 1 .…”
Section: Combined Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why we need clause (2) in Definition 23. The clause (1) is originated from [21] and [29]. Definition 24 (1) Two configurations C and D are strongly bisimilar, denoted by C ∼ c D, if there is a strong probabilistic bisimulation R such that (C, D) ∈ R. (2) Two processes P and Q are strongly bisimilar, denoted by P ∼ p Q, if for any context C and any indexed setv of values, < P [v/x]; C >∼ c < Q[v/x]; C >.…”
Section: Strong Probabilistic Bisimulation Between Quantum Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantics of π prob is based on Probabilistic Automata, which were introduced in [13]. We briefly recall here the main notions, simplified and adapted for our needs.…”
Section: Probabilistic Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%