2016
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1499760018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic well-posedness for supercritical wave equations with periodic boundary condition on dimension three

Abstract: In this article, by following the strategies in dealing with supercritical cubic and quintic wave equations in (J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 16 (2014) 1-30) and (J. Math. Pures Appl. ( 9) 105 (2016) 342-366), we obtain that, the equationThe key point here is that p−3 p−1 is much smaller than the critical index 3 2 − 2 p−1 for 3 < p < 5.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In a recent preprint [35], Killip-Murphy-Vişan proved almost sure global well-posedness and scattering below the energy space for the defocusing energy-critical cubic NLS on R 4 in the radial setting, where the Morawetz estimate (among other tools available in the radial setting) played an important role. 7 While the main result in [49] is stated on the three-dimensional torus T 3 , the same result holds on R 3 by the same proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…6 In a recent preprint [35], Killip-Murphy-Vişan proved almost sure global well-posedness and scattering below the energy space for the defocusing energy-critical cubic NLS on R 4 in the radial setting, where the Morawetz estimate (among other tools available in the radial setting) played an important role. 7 While the main result in [49] is stated on the three-dimensional torus T 3 , the same result holds on R 3 by the same proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The proof of (1) and (2) in this proposition is standard, see for example [24] or [26]. The proof of (3) follows from the similar argument as in Section 5.…”
Section: Polynomial Nonlinearity In the Case Of A General Randomisationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The almost sure boundedness of the linear evolution part is guaranteed by the following lemma, see for example Proposition 2.7 in [26]. Lemma 7.2.…”
Section: Polynomial Nonlinearity In the Case Of A General Randomisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This equation is H 1 critical and the data is a typical element with respect to µ ∈ M s , s > 1/2. We refer also to [31,43] for extensions of Theorem 2.3 to nonlinearities between cubic and quintic.…”
Section: Extensions To More General Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%