2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.68.036311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability density function of turbulent velocity fluctuations in a rough-wall boundary layer

Abstract: The probability density function of single-point velocity fluctuations in turbulence is studied systematically using Fourier coefficients in the energy-containing range. In ideal turbulence where energy-containing motions are random and independent, the Fourier coefficients tend to Gaussian and independent of each other. Velocity fluctuations accordingly tend to Gaussian. However, if energy-containing motions are intermittent or contaminated with bounded-amplitude motions such as wavy wakes, the Fourier coeffi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sub-Gaussian results (with pdf flatness factor F =< u 4 > / < u 2 > less than 3) are probably from the dominance of a small number of large-scale modes, while the hyper-Gaussian results (F > 3) may be the result of correlations between Fourier modes Mouri et al 2003), an alignment of vortex tubes (Takaoka 1995), or intermittency (Schlichting & Gersten 2000). The results are unexplained quantitatively.…”
Section: Velocity Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sub-Gaussian results (with pdf flatness factor F =< u 4 > / < u 2 > less than 3) are probably from the dominance of a small number of large-scale modes, while the hyper-Gaussian results (F > 3) may be the result of correlations between Fourier modes Mouri et al 2003), an alignment of vortex tubes (Takaoka 1995), or intermittency (Schlichting & Gersten 2000). The results are unexplained quantitatively.…”
Section: Velocity Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This can be seen by noting that successive velocities are positively correlated for inelastic point particles conserving mass and momentum but not energy. Then the velocity changes are not independent and the central limit theorem does not apply (see Mouri et al 2003). Such correlations, resulting entirely from the large range of dissipation scales, would be a fundamental difference between incompressible and supersonic turbulence.…”
Section: Velocity Probability Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 The log-law sublayer was at z Ӎ 0.15-0.35 m. The measurement was done at z = 0.25 and 0.70 m. The height z = 0.25 was in the log-law sublayer, where various eddies filled the space randomly and independently. 16 The flatness factor ͗v͑x͒ 4 ͘ / ͗v͑x͒ 2 ͘ 2 was close to the Gaussian value of 3. The height z = 0.70 m was in the wake sublayer, where eddies did not fill the space.…”
Section: A Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It ensures that the turbulence was fully developed and various eddies filled the space randomly and independently. 23,24 Not always close to the Gaussian value were u 3 / u 2 3/2 and u 4 / u 2 2 − 3 (Table I). They are sensitive to specific features of the energy-containing eddies that depend on the grid, the roughness, or the nozzle.…”
Section: Appendix: Details Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%