2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-021-02369-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability Estimates of Short-Term Rockburst Risk with Ensemble Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five ensemble classifiers based on logistic regression, naive Bayes, Gaussian process (GP), multilayer perceptron (MLP), SVM and DT were used to estimate the occurrence probability of each risk level for short-term rockburst prediction. The results showed that the comprehensive performance of ensemble classifiers was better than each basic classifier individually [160].…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Five ensemble classifiers based on logistic regression, naive Bayes, Gaussian process (GP), multilayer perceptron (MLP), SVM and DT were used to estimate the occurrence probability of each risk level for short-term rockburst prediction. The results showed that the comprehensive performance of ensemble classifiers was better than each basic classifier individually [160].…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They found that the RF was the optimal model. Liang et al [27] utilized weighting voting to combine six intelligent techniques to forecast short-term rockburst. The capacity of the comprehensive combined model was better than that of the base classifiers.…”
Section: Algorithm Superiority Drawbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ensemble model that adopted KNN and RNN performed best in all ensemble models. Although these ensemble models show a high level of prediction accuracy, some practical problems [27,28] prevent them from being widely used.…”
Section: Algorithm Superiority Drawbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xin et al (2021) [19] proposed an explainable time-frequency convolutional neural network (CNN) to provide an excellent classification performance and explainability. Liang et al (2021) [20] combined multiple base learners and classifiers to estimate the probability of short-term rockburst risks and achieved good performance. Saad and Chen (2020) [21] extracted waveforms from continuous microseismic data using an automatic unsupervised method, which outperformed the simple k-means and short-term and long-term average ratio methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%