2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00394.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability of anti‐D development in D− patients receiving D+ RBCs

Abstract: The actual frequency of antibody formation in our patients is much lower than assumed. On the other hand, prolonged hemolysis probably induced by additional autoreactive antibodies might occur. This possible complication has not yet been addressed. Further studies might reveal whether a less restricted transfusion policy with respect to D matching is justified in selected patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
109
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Certain requirements must be met for alloimmunization to occur, including appropriate presentation of the foreign antigen by the recipient's antigen-presenting cells 3 ; however, variable alloantibody response rates (20%-80%) are observed even for antigens such as Rh(D), thought to be nearly universally capable of presentation by the recipient's immune system. [4][5][6] As an immunology paradigm, presentation of the same antigen under one set of conditions may lead to tolerance, whereas presentation under a different set of conditions (such as in the presence of a danger signal) may lead to immunity. 7 In the setting of an RBC transfusion, a danger signal may come from either the transfused product itself (eg, cytokines, white blood cells, damaged RBCs, or bacteria) or from recipient factors (eg, underlying disease, infection, or genetic status).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Certain requirements must be met for alloimmunization to occur, including appropriate presentation of the foreign antigen by the recipient's antigen-presenting cells 3 ; however, variable alloantibody response rates (20%-80%) are observed even for antigens such as Rh(D), thought to be nearly universally capable of presentation by the recipient's immune system. [4][5][6] As an immunology paradigm, presentation of the same antigen under one set of conditions may lead to tolerance, whereas presentation under a different set of conditions (such as in the presence of a danger signal) may lead to immunity. 7 In the setting of an RBC transfusion, a danger signal may come from either the transfused product itself (eg, cytokines, white blood cells, damaged RBCs, or bacteria) or from recipient factors (eg, underlying disease, infection, or genetic status).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one prospective and three retrospective observational studies published in the last decade showed us two intriguing sets of data [104,105,106,107]. First, the frequency of anti-D alloimmunization following D+ RBC transfusion ranged from 21 to 33% in D- patients who were not iatrogenically immunosuppressed.…”
Section: Part 2: Plt Transfusion and The D Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies deliberately exposing healthy D-negative volunteers to D-positive blood, to obtain IgG anti-D for immunoprophylaxis purposis, showed that appoximately eighty percent of D-negative individuals will produce serological detectable anti-D [68][69][70][71] . Studies on D-immunization after D-positive RBC transfusions in Dnegative patients reported comparable 72 or lower immunization rates [73][74][75][76][77][78][79] . In a number of these studies the low rate of D immunization is associated with a depressed immune system [73][74][75][76] .…”
Section: Immunogenicitymentioning
confidence: 99%