2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability of New-Onset Cancer Between Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and a Comparison General Population Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the starting time point of malignant development is difficult to determine; therefore, we set the beginning of the observation period to 2000. Consistent with our previous study, the mean time from TBI to cancer diagnosis was 4.8 years among mild TBI patients and 5.0 years among moderate/severe TBI patients; these durations are shorter than that among the general population, which is approximately 5.9 years [ 19 ]. Because it is hard to understand that cancer can occur within such a short period of time after a traumatic brain injury, we believe that cancer may also be a risk factor for brain injury, given that the cause and effect relationship needs to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the starting time point of malignant development is difficult to determine; therefore, we set the beginning of the observation period to 2000. Consistent with our previous study, the mean time from TBI to cancer diagnosis was 4.8 years among mild TBI patients and 5.0 years among moderate/severe TBI patients; these durations are shorter than that among the general population, which is approximately 5.9 years [ 19 ]. Because it is hard to understand that cancer can occur within such a short period of time after a traumatic brain injury, we believe that cancer may also be a risk factor for brain injury, given that the cause and effect relationship needs to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Taiwan [ 17 ], the mortality rate of patients with cancer remains high and cancer is a leading cause of mortality for all populations [ 18 ]. A novel finding in our recent study indicated that TBI patients had a 1.27-fold higher risk for a new diagnosis of systemic cancer than those without TBI, and our TBI patients had greater frequencies of cancer in the head and neck structures [ 19 ]. Based on the concept that injury severity is a critical outcome predictor following TBI [ 20 , 21 ], whether the severity of TBI affects systemic malignant cancer development is worth investigating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Chen et al [10] and Hu et al [11] conducted population-based studies and suggested a possible etiological relationship between THI and brain cancer. Further support was also presented in other work by Wee et al [62] who applied a regression analysis on a cohort of 34,556 patients with THI and 69,112 patients without THI over a period of 15 years in Taiwan. Their results showed that brain cancer incidence was higher in patients with THI (4.38%) in comparison to those without THI (3.88%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To cope with unobserved/unmeasured covariates in this study, we adopted the approach generally utilized in Bayesian disease mapping and analysis where, spatially structured and spatially unstructured random effects are included in the regression model [73]. For future work, we intend to explore other potential significant risk factor covariates such as age and gender which may be related to the outcome variable [2,62,74]. Other factors including socio-economic status have shown some association with brain cancer in previous work and may also be considered for future research [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%