2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability of receiving a high cumulative radiation dose and primary clinical indication of CT examinations: a 5-year observational cohort study

Abstract: ObjectiveHigh radiation exposure is a concern because of the association with cancer. The objective was to determine the probability of receiving a high radiation dose from CT (from one or more examinations within a 5-year period) and to assess the clinical context by evaluating clinical indications in the high-dose patient group.DesignObservational cohort study. Effective radiation dose received from one or more CT examinations within a predefined 5-year calendar period was assessed for each patient.SettingHo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cumulative effective dose superior to 100 mSv represents a greater probability of causing effects due to radiation exposure [4,5]. When comparing this group of patients with the literature, the result is similar, with approximately 1% of patients fitting into these conditions (Table 1) [21][22][23][24]. Frequent repetitive CT scans for the same patient in a short period indicate the need for a more specific and individualized analysis to characterize this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A cumulative effective dose superior to 100 mSv represents a greater probability of causing effects due to radiation exposure [4,5]. When comparing this group of patients with the literature, the result is similar, with approximately 1% of patients fitting into these conditions (Table 1) [21][22][23][24]. Frequent repetitive CT scans for the same patient in a short period indicate the need for a more specific and individualized analysis to characterize this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…3 A drawback of CT is the use of ionizing radiation, exposure to which may become high, in particular when accumulating from multiple scans. [4][5][6] Radiation dose optimization is necessary and even mandatory: radiation exposure per CT scan needs to be reduced while maintaining sufficient diagnostic image quality (IQ). 7,8 Finding the optimum balance between patient radiation exposure and IQ for each CT procedure is time consuming and not straightforward, particularly as there is no universal measure for clinical IQ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) has become an indispensable diagnostic tool in daily clinical practice, 1,2 and advances in the technology are ongoing 3 . A drawback of CT is the use of ionizing radiation, exposure to which may become high, in particular when accumulating from multiple scans 4–6 . Radiation dose optimization is necessary and even mandatory: radiation exposure per CT scan needs to be reduced while maintaining sufficient diagnostic image quality (IQ) 7,8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%