2019
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.00905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability weighting bias in risky decision making: Psychological mechanism and optimizing strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the study design, all six studies in our research used the case of 50% risk probability, which is moderate. However, other studies have demonstrated that probability affects individuals' risk preferences (e.g., Sun et al, 2019;Sun, Zhang, Zhang, & Zhang, 2018;Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). According to cumulative prospect theory, people's risk attitudes showed a distinctive fourfold pattern: risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses of moderate and high probability, and risk seeking for gains and risk aversion for losses of low probability (Tversky & Kahneman, 1992).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study design, all six studies in our research used the case of 50% risk probability, which is moderate. However, other studies have demonstrated that probability affects individuals' risk preferences (e.g., Sun et al, 2019;Sun, Zhang, Zhang, & Zhang, 2018;Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). According to cumulative prospect theory, people's risk attitudes showed a distinctive fourfold pattern: risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses of moderate and high probability, and risk seeking for gains and risk aversion for losses of low probability (Tversky & Kahneman, 1992).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%