International Forum on Medical Imaging in Asia 2021 2021
DOI: 10.1117/12.2590805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probe localization from ultrasound image sequences using deep learning for volume reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the consistency loss is a form of "teacher forcing" commonly adopted in training sequence models, which makes use of the ground-truth targets, rather than the previous predictions, to supervise the subsequent prediction during training. It has been proven advantageous in sequence-to-sequence models [14].…”
Section: Loss Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, the consistency loss is a form of "teacher forcing" commonly adopted in training sequence models, which makes use of the ground-truth targets, rather than the previous predictions, to supervise the subsequent prediction during training. It has been proven advantageous in sequence-to-sequence models [14].…”
Section: Loss Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], ResNet and FlowNetS were integrated for a better localization and optical flow estimation, and consistency loss derived from stereo vision was added. Forward consistency loss was then proposed in [14]. In [13], RNN was used to estimate both relative and absolute probe poses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable a smooth 3D reconstruction, a case-wise correlation loss based on 3D CNN and Pearson correlation coefficient was proposed in [10,12]. Qi et al [13] leverages past and future frames to estimate the relative transformation between each pair of the sequence; they used the consistency loss proposed in [14]. Despite the success of these approaches, they still suffer significant cumulative drift errors and mainly focus on linear probe motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%