2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40655-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing chemotaxis activity in Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions

Abstract: Bacterial chemotaxis signaling may be interesting for the development of rapid biosensor assays, but is difficult to quantify. Here we explore two potential fluorescent readouts of chemotactically active Escherichia coli cells. In the first, we probed interactions between the chemotaxis signaling proteins CheY and CheZ by fusing them individually with non-fluorescent parts of stable or unstable ‘split’-Green Fluorescent Protein. Wild-type chemotactic cells but not mutants lacking the Che… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If both CheY1 and CheY2 of A. fabrum were involved in the chemotaxis signaling transduction, the co-localization of CheA and CheY1 (or CheY2) at cell poles could be observed. To visualize the co-localization of CheA and CheY1 (or CheY2) in the A. fabrum cell, eGFP was split into two non-fluorescent parts (N-terminal part and C-terminal part) at the peptide bond between residues 158 and 159 [ 39 ]. The C-terminal part (C egfp ) of eGFP was fused to the C-terminus of CheA to form the CheA-C egfp fusion protein and the N-terminal part (N egfp ) of eGFP was fused to the C-terminus of CheY1 (or CheY2) to form the CheY1-N egfp (or CheY2-N egfp ) fusion protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If both CheY1 and CheY2 of A. fabrum were involved in the chemotaxis signaling transduction, the co-localization of CheA and CheY1 (or CheY2) at cell poles could be observed. To visualize the co-localization of CheA and CheY1 (or CheY2) in the A. fabrum cell, eGFP was split into two non-fluorescent parts (N-terminal part and C-terminal part) at the peptide bond between residues 158 and 159 [ 39 ]. The C-terminal part (C egfp ) of eGFP was fused to the C-terminus of CheA to form the CheA-C egfp fusion protein and the N-terminal part (N egfp ) of eGFP was fused to the C-terminus of CheY1 (or CheY2) to form the CheY1-N egfp (or CheY2-N egfp ) fusion protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the interaction between CheA and CheY in vivo, eGFP protein was split at the peptide bond between amino acid residues 158 and 159 [ 39 ]. The C-terminal part of the eGFP protein (residues 158–238) was fused to the C-terminus of CheA with a seven-residue linker (GTSGGSG) between two fused parts to generate CheA-linker-C egfp fusion protein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic chip experiments were performed using E. coli strain MG1655 and its derivatives: the motile wild type (WT) E. coli MG1655 (CGSC#: 8237; Yale E. coli genetic stock center) tagged with GFP (pME6012-P tac -gfp) 75 ; the non-flagellated mutant E. coli MG1655 ( ΔfliM ) tagged with mCherry (pME6012-P tac -mCherry) 76 ; the mutant lacking the AI-2 synthase gene luxS , E. coli MG1655 ( ΔluxS ) tagged with GFP (pME6012-P tac -gfp, this work); the mutant lacking the gene cheA , E. coli MG1655 ( ΔcheA ) 77 ; the mutant lacking the gene tsr , E. coli MG1655 ( Δtsr ) 77 and AI-2 reporter E. coli MG1655 (pMSs201-P lsrR -gfp) 53 . The inoculum for the microfluidic chip experiments was grown overnight in 4 mL of lysogeny broth Miller (LB) with 25 µg/mL of kanamycin at 37 °C and 180 rpm shaking, followed by 1:100 dilution in fresh LB and incubation until exponential growth phase ( ~ 3 hours).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, further improvement was obtained by Blakeley et al [ 16 ] who devised a “super positive” GFP (spGFP) featuring a much higher net charge (+34) than that of sg100 (–8), based on the observation that increasing protein charge is associated with increased solubility. In addition to sg100, frGFP and spGFP, split enhanced GFP (eGFP [ 17 ]) and split eYFP [ 18 ] have also been used. In the case of sg100, fr and spGFP, the bipartite reporter was generated by cutting the loop linking β-strands 7 and 8 between residues 157 and 158, which yields two moieties, respectively made of the first seven (NGFP) and the last four (CGFP) β-strands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%