2014
DOI: 10.2478/gpe-2014-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing Electronic Properties of Graphene on the Atomic Scale by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy

Abstract: Atomic scale investigations of the electronic properties of graphene are playing a crucial role in understanding and tuning the exotic properties of this material for its potential device applications. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy (STS) are unique techniques for atomic scale investigations and have been extensively used in graphene research. In this article, we review recent progresses in STM and STS studies of the electronic properties of suspended graphene as well as graphene supporte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(382 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In weakly interacting graphene/metal systems, multiple different graphene domains with varied moirépatterns coexist. 39,40 We have observed different graphene domains on our graphene/Ir(111) sample surface (see Supplementary Figure S2). Interestingly, we find that the transition between the molecular arrangement with vacancies and the one without vacancies always occurs at the boundaries between different domains on the underlying graphene/Ir(111) surface (see Supplementary Figure S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In weakly interacting graphene/metal systems, multiple different graphene domains with varied moirépatterns coexist. 39,40 We have observed different graphene domains on our graphene/Ir(111) sample surface (see Supplementary Figure S2). Interestingly, we find that the transition between the molecular arrangement with vacancies and the one without vacancies always occurs at the boundaries between different domains on the underlying graphene/Ir(111) surface (see Supplementary Figure S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is worth mentioning that the electron scattering induced by doping defects was observed in STM measurements of N-doped single layer graphene on the SiO 2 , Cu, , SiC, , and graphene/SiC surfaces. However, such electron scattering was not observed in our STM measurements of N-doped single layer graphene on Ru(0001), which can be ascribed to the disturbance induced by the strong interfacial interaction between graphene and Ru. …”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, they can be used to identify the close relations between the electronic energy spectra and the orbital hybridizations of the chemical bonds. To date, such experimental measurements have been successfully used to confirm the electronic band structure near the Fermi level and the dimension-diversified van Hove singularities in monolayer graphene 64 and few-layer graphene systems 6567 , 1D graphene nanoribbons 68,69 , adatom-adsorbed graphene 70 , monolayer silicene 71 , and hydrogenated silicene 72 . Obviously, the theoretical predictions on the halogen-diversified DOSs can be thoroughly affirmed by the STS experiments, including the vanishing or existing of the finite value of DOSs at the Fermi level, the Si- or halogen-dominated strong peaks, and the halogen-modified σ shoulder structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%