“…In broad terms, therefore, these interesting, if subtle, differences in the intrinsic 1 Δ 195 Pt( 37/35 Cl) isotope effects observed in the [PtCl 6– n (OH) n ] 2– ( n = 1–5) anions, compared to their aquated (protonated) [PtCl 6– n (H 2 O) n ] (2– n )– ( n = 1–5) analogues, , can be understood in the context of the very high sensitivity of the σ( 195 Pt) nuclear shielding to extremely small differences in Pt–X (X = 35/37 Cl/OH/OH 2 ) bond displacements in their respective isotopologues (and when possible isotopomers), as previously predicted by the elegant theoretical work of Jameson et al − and in subsequent density functional theory (DFT) computational studies. ,− Generally, the intrinsic isotope shift for an NMR-active nucleus M bound to isotope X in a compound MX can be written as ΔM n ( m ′ / m X ) = σ M − σ M * = δ M * after the notation of Gombler and Jameson, where m and m ′ are the mass numbers of the light and heavy isotopes of element X, respectively, bound to M, with n indicating the number of chemical bonds separating atoms M and X, and σ M and δ M represent the magnetic shielding and chemical shift of nucleus M, with the asterisk indicating the quantities pertaining to the heavier isotope. It follows from the above definition that isotope shifts are usually negative ; i.e., the heavier isotope usually induces greater shielding or negative chemical shift change (after the sign convention proposed by Gombler and Wasylishen et al).…”