2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.044802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing LHC halo dynamics using collimator loss rates at 6.5 TeV

Abstract: Halo diffusion measurements at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) were conducted with beams for physics at 6.5 TeV by means of collimator scans, carried out between 2016 and 2018. From the time evolution of the beam losses recorded during a collimator scan, in which collimator jaws are moved in steps toward the beam core cutting beam tails, one can extract information on the halo diffusion and its population as a function of the transverse amplitude. In this paper, results of the first scans performed at dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that halo re-population mechanisms are not considered in these simulations, although they should be taken into account in future studies to provide refined predictions and an improved operational scenario. Note that a re-population time of several tens of seconds for tails above 5 σ is expected, assuming a similar diffusion coefficient as that measured recently at the LHC [16].…”
Section: Halo-depletion Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to note that halo re-population mechanisms are not considered in these simulations, although they should be taken into account in future studies to provide refined predictions and an improved operational scenario. Note that a re-population time of several tens of seconds for tails above 5 σ is expected, assuming a similar diffusion coefficient as that measured recently at the LHC [16].…”
Section: Halo-depletion Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…a Maximum total head-on tune shift of 0.02, as only two IPs will be colliding head-on One of the main motivations comes from the requirement to handle the estimated stored energy present in the beam tails for all design loss scenarios. Various measurements carried out at the LHC indicate strong overpopulated tails with respect to a typical Gaussian transverse beam distribution [14][15][16]. Scaling these observations to HL-LHC beams, under the assumption that their population scales linearly with the bunch intensity, led to the conclusion that up to about 36 MJ might be stored in the beam tails [16].…”
Section: Beam Energy [Tev]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a solid experimental basis from measurements at the LHC that indicates consistently the presence of large tail populations [16,17]: reducing the steady-state population of tails is important to mitigate known and unknown loss effects and might even become mandatory if some fast failure scenarios cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Hel Specifications For Enhanced Beam Collimation 31 Motivations and Required Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that random activation of the electron beam completely removes the proton halo beyond the electron beam inner radius on a timescale 𝑂(10 s). Very important are the parallel investigations of the proton beam halo and diffusion rates in the LHC beams at CERN [78], and the halo removal rates by hollow electron lens in the RHIC [79]. For the latter study, one of the two RHIC electron lenses was changed from a Gaussian beam profile to a hollow profile.…”
Section: S and Beyond: Electron Lenses In Lhc And Iota Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%