2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.104036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing modified gravity with atom-interferometry: A numerical approach

Abstract: Refined constraints on chameleon theories are calculated for atom-interferometry experiments, using a numerical approach consisting in solving for a four-region model the static and spherically symmetric Klein-Gordon equation for the chameleon field. By modeling not only the test mass and the vacuum chamber but also its walls and the exterior environment, the method allows to probe new effects on the scalar field profile and the induced acceleration of atoms. In the case of a weakly perturbing test mass, the e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivations for this work are three-fold. Firstly, the exact approach followed here allows us to quantify the validity of the approximations made in [54], as well to place rigorous constraints on chameleon theories from the experimental bound on a. Secondly, it allows us to check claims in the literature that accounting for the chamber walls leads to a significant effect on the field profile deep inside the chamber [55] or that the thin-shell expression that goes back to [2,3] gives a poor approximation to the chameleon force [56]. We will see that these claims are wrong.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivations for this work are three-fold. Firstly, the exact approach followed here allows us to quantify the validity of the approximations made in [54], as well to place rigorous constraints on chameleon theories from the experimental bound on a. Secondly, it allows us to check claims in the literature that accounting for the chamber walls leads to a significant effect on the field profile deep inside the chamber [55] or that the thin-shell expression that goes back to [2,3] gives a poor approximation to the chameleon force [56]. We will see that these claims are wrong.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same numerical method has been used to derive constraints on other chameleon potentials in Ref. 5 for the thin shell regime. Our numerical method could be easily extended to other modified gravity models like the symmetron.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although tests of general relativity in the solar system would exclude the corresponding parameter space for the chameleon field but in order to find significant deviations for the dynamical chameleon scalar field with attractor behaviour 1 in astrophysical scales we have focused on greater values of the constant taken from cosmology. It's order of magnitude for different values of n can be found using the following relation [33,34] logM…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%