2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing number of layers and quality assessment of mechanically exfoliated graphene via Raman fingerprint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Papanai et al examined graphene layer numbers of mechanically exfoliated graphene flakes using Raman spectroscopy [ 79 ]. The authors used intensity ratios (I 2D /I G ) and peak widths of the 2D-band to determine layer numbers.…”
Section: Techniques Used To Determine Numbers Of Graphene Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Papanai et al examined graphene layer numbers of mechanically exfoliated graphene flakes using Raman spectroscopy [ 79 ]. The authors used intensity ratios (I 2D /I G ) and peak widths of the 2D-band to determine layer numbers.…”
Section: Techniques Used To Determine Numbers Of Graphene Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used intensity ratios (I 2D /I G ) and peak widths of the 2D-band to determine layer numbers. The 2D peak of single-layer graphene (SLG) consisted of a single Lorentzian peak with a width of 24 cm −1 , but this was split into four, six, and five components for 2-, 3-, and 5-layer graphenes, respectively [ 79 ]. Niilisk et al used Raman spectroscopy to investigate the multilayer stacking of graphene grown on Ni [ 80 ].…”
Section: Techniques Used To Determine Numbers Of Graphene Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a, offset introduced for clarity) for the three samples we investigated (labeled A, B and C). For all samples, the graphene is determined to be monolayer by the symmetric single-peak shape of the 2D-peak [18,19] (at 2679 cm -1 ) and the intensity ratio of 2D and G peak (at 2679 cm -1 ) which is larger than 2 [20]. The position of the 2D-and the Gpeak is used to demonstrate that there is no significant strain present in the samples [21] (more details in the supplementary information).…”
Section: Characterization Of Doping Level and Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝐼 𝐺 ≈ 0.45), suggesting the presence of multiple layers of graphene in 3D-C [148,149]. This ratio is also lower than that of Sample A (…”
Section: Variation Of Densitymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…𝐼 𝐺 ≈ 0.51), signifying the presence of few layers of graphene in 3D-C [148,149]. This ratio is also lower than that of Sample A (…”
Section: Variation Of Densitymentioning
confidence: 76%